Skip to content

Menu

LexBlog, Inc. logo
NetworkSub-MenuBrowse by SubjectBrowse by PublisherBrowse by ChannelAbout the NetworkJoin the NetworkProductsSub-MenuProducts OverviewBlog ProBlog PlusBlog PremierMicrositeSyndication PortalsAbout UsContactSubscribeSupport
Book a Demo
Search
Close

Singapore Looks to Tighten Corporate Disclosures of Directors’ Personal Data

By Squire Patton Boggs on May 10, 2024
Email this postTweet this postLike this postShare this post on LinkedIn

On 7 May 2024, Singapore’s Parliament introduced an Accounting and Corporate Regulatory Authority of Singapore (ACRA) Registry and Regulatory Enhancements Bill (Bill), which will limit public disclosures of company directors’ residential addresses on the business registry in Singapore.

Currently, the business profile of a company or partnership that is set up in Singapore can be retrieved for a fee from the registry, which is administered by ACRA. The profile captures certain personal particulars of the entity’s directors and individual shareholders or partners; namely, their full name and address, identification number, nationality/citizenship and their date of appointment. An appointed person’s address has included, or been considered to mean, their residential address.

However, the Bill seeks to clarify that for future records filed with or maintained by ACRA, residential addresses must be excluded from public disclosure if an individual’s contact address is available. Such contact address may be an address at which the individual can be reached, but in which he or she does not reside or live, for instance, an office.

This is subject to certain exceptions, for instance:

  • If the individual needs to be reached for legitimate reasons and communications sent to their contact address that require a response within a specific period are unanswered
  • There is some other evidence to show that service of any document at that contact address is not effective in bringing it to the individual’s attention

Regardless of these exclusions (which serve legitimate law enforcement and identity verification purposes anyway), this move follows a well-considered and thorough consultation process that gained traction from as early as January 2022 and will culminate in the passing of an amendment to Singapore’s corporate registry framework with data protection and privacy in mind.

Disclaimer: The views and opinions expressed here are of the author(s) alone and do not necessarily reflect the opinion or position of Squire Patton Boggs or its clients. While every effort has been made to ensure that the information contained in this article is accurate, neither its author(s) nor Squire Patton Boggs accept responsibility for any errors or omissions. The content of this article is for general information only and is not intended to constitute or be relied upon as legal advice.

  • Posted in:
    Privacy & Data Security
  • Blog:
    Privacy World
  • Organization:
    Squire Patton Boggs
  • Article: View Original Source

LexBlog, Inc. logo
Facebook LinkedIn Twitter RSS
Real Lawyers
99 Park Row
  • About LexBlog
  • Careers
  • Press
  • Contact LexBlog
  • Privacy Policy
  • Editorial Policy
  • Disclaimer
  • Terms of Service
  • RSS Terms of Service
  • Products
  • Blog Pro
  • Blog Plus
  • Blog Premier
  • Microsite
  • Syndication Portals
  • LexBlog Community
  • Resource Center
  • 1-800-913-0988
  • Submit a Request
  • Support Center
  • System Status
  • Resource Center
  • Blogging 101

New to the Network

  • Beyond the First 100 Days
  • In the Legal Interest
  • Cooking with SALT
  • The Fiduciary Litigator
  • CCN Mexico Report™
Copyright © 2025, LexBlog, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
Law blog design & platform by LexBlog LexBlog Logo