The courtroom setting is unfamiliar to most prospective
jurors as they sit with a group of strangers and are grilled by counsel during
voir dire. In addition, potential jurors may respond differently depending on
whether they want to be off or on a particular jury. Therefore, their responses
may not entirely reflect that person’s “truth.”
However, an individual’s body language will almost always be
consistent with the person’s “truth,” despite what is spoken. To
assess the veracity of any given prospective juror’s verbal response, pay close
attention to their body language, in particular body language that conflicts
with oral responses.
Watch each prospective juror’s body language as they respond
to questions, whether the
questions come from you, opposing counsel or the judge. For
example, if prospective jurors say, “Yes, I can be fair” but their head is
going side to side, signaling “No,” believe their body language.
Similarly, if potential jurors say, “No, I would not be prejudiced against
. . . ” but their head is bobbing up and down, signaling “Yes,”
believe their body language which is clearly saying “Yes, I would be
prejudiced.”
If prospective jurors say they would give damages in a
certain type of case, but their arms are crossed in front of their chest,
either they won’t give damages, or they would award very little.
If prospective jurors say, “Yes, I can keep an open
mind,” but they squirm in their seats, something about keeping an open
mind is making them anxious. Continue to observe
the behavior when asking the next questions. See if the
squirming continues. If so, this may indicate a need to visit the restroom or
anxiety about being a juror. If, however, the squirming ceases, the person’s
anxiety is only relevant to that particular question and can be read in that
context.
Body language always outdoes the spoken word.