Skip to content

Menu

LexBlog, Inc. logo
NetworkSub-MenuBrowse by SubjectBrowse by PublisherJoin the NetworkGet StartedSubscribeSupportContact
Search
Close

Showdown Over Workplace Speech – Litigation Filed to Enjoin SB 399 Prohibiting Mandatory Meetings During Union Organizing

By Jonathan A. Siegel on January 8, 2025
Email this postTweet this postLike this postShare this post on LinkedIn
Desktop after work
Luca Bravo, Unsplash

On January 1, 2025, Senate (SB) Bill 399, officially went into effect in California. California joined other states, including Illinois, Connecticut, Hawaii, New York, and Oregon, in enacting statutes that prohibit “captive audience” meetings, similarly limiting employers’ ability to conduct mandatory meetings on religious or political matters, including a labor organization.

Several business groups have filed a federal lawsuit challenging the constitutionality of SB 399 and seeking declaratory and injunctive relief. The lawsuit, filed in the Eastern District of California, argues that the law infringes on employers’ rights to free speech and equal protection under the First and Fourteenth Amendments of the U.S. Constitution. The plaintiffs contend that SB 399 discriminates against employers’ viewpoints on political matters and restricts the content of their communications with employees. They argue that the law stifles employer speech and is preempted by the National Labor Relations Act (NLRA), which protects employer free speech under Section 8(c).

The legal battle over SB 399 highlights the ongoing tension between protecting workers’ rights and preserving employers’ freedom of speech.

If plaintiffs are successful, SB 399 may be blocked from enforcement but employers will need to wait to see how the court views the case. While litigation is pending, California employers may need to consider whether it is in their organization’s best interest to make such meeting attendance voluntary or proceed in accordance with the NLRA.

Jackson Lewis will continue to track the legal challenge. If you have questions about SB 399 or related issues, contact a Jackson Lewis attorney to discuss.

Photo of Jonathan A. Siegel Jonathan A. Siegel

Jonathan A. Siegel is a principal in the Orange County, California, office of Jackson Lewis P.C. He practices before the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, National Labor Relations Board, state and federal agencies and courts.

Jonathan also provides advice and counsel regarding labor and…

Jonathan A. Siegel is a principal in the Orange County, California, office of Jackson Lewis P.C. He practices before the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, National Labor Relations Board, state and federal agencies and courts.

Jonathan also provides advice and counsel regarding labor and employment law with respect to various issues including wage and hour law, reduction in force, WARN Act, corporate restructuring, layoffs, discipline, leave management, harassment and discrimination issues. Jonathan defends employers regarding different varieties of wrongful termination and discrimination claims.

Read more about Jonathan A. SiegelEmail
Show more Show less
  • Posted in:
    Employment & Labor
  • Blog:
    California Workplace Law Blog
  • Organization:
    Jackson Lewis P.C.
  • Article: View Original Source

Call us at 1-800-913-0988 or email sales@lexblog.com.

Facebook LinkedIn Twitter RSS
The Library at LexBlog
  • About LexBlog
  • The Field We Built
  • Library at LexBlog
  • Our Beliefs
  • Our Team
  • Contact LexBlog
  • Disclaimer
  • Editorial Policy
  • Terms of Service
  • Get Started
  • Publishing Solutions
  • Compass
  • Submit a Request
  • Support Center
  • System Status
Copyright © 2026, LexBlog, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
Law blog design & platform by LexBlog LexBlog Logo