Skip to content

Menu

LexBlog, Inc. logo
NetworkSub-MenuBrowse by SubjectBrowse by PublisherJoin the NetworkGet StartedSubscribeSupportContact
Search
Close

Why Safety Culture and Accountability Matter on Multi-Employer Worksites

By Andrew N. Davis & Sarah Kettenmann on May 5, 2025
Email this postTweet this postLike this postShare this post on LinkedIn
constructionsite

When working on a multi-employer worksite, safety is everyone’s responsibility. Whether you’re a general contractor, subcontractor, or sub-subcontractor, you could be held liable for employee injuries under OSHA’s Multi-Employer Citation Policy, even if they aren’t your direct employees or you didn’t directly create the hazard.

This is why we advise clients that having a clear safety culture, documented behavioral expectations and an accountability structure is crucial to minimizing liability.

Understanding OSHA’s Employer Categories

OSHA categorizes employers on multi-employer worksites into four types: Creating, Exposing, Controlling and Correcting. For example, if a scaffolding company (the “creating employer”) installs platforms improperly, a drywall subcontractor (the “exposing employer”) might send workers up to the unstable scaffold. The general contractor (the “controlling employer”) oversees the entire site, while another subcontractor (the “correcting employer”) is responsible for inspecting and maintaining all scaffolding. If OSHA investigates, all four employers could face citations, regardless of whether the employees at risk are their direct reports or if they created the hazard.

Building a Strong Safety Culture

A strong safety culture means everyone understands the expectations and knows how to report concerns without fear of retaliation. However, culture alone isn’t enough. You need structure: written policies that define responsibilities, clear communication protocols for hazard reporting and regular site-wide safety meetings that include all trades. Injuries involving a sub-subcontractor’s worker can trigger citations throughout the contracting chain, especially if proper documentation or accountability is lacking.

Key Takeaways for Employers

  1. Know Your Role: Understand whether you’re a creating, exposing, correcting or controlling employer—and remember, you can be more than one type at the same time.
  2. Build a Safety Culture: Encourage open communication, proactive hazard identification and shared responsibility across all trades and tiers.
  3. Document Everything: Keep written records of inspections, training, incident reports and corrective actions. If it’s not documented, it didn’t happen in OSHA’s eyes.
  4. Vet and Train Subcontractors: Ensure contractors and subs meet your safety standards before they set foot on site—and hold them accountable throughout the project.
  5. Integrate Safety into Contracts: Make safety expectations and obligations explicit in all your agreements, including right-to-correct provisions and reporting requirements.

Strong safety culture and clear accountability structures are more than just good practices—they’re your best defense in a multi-employer compliance landscape.

Photo of Andrew N. Davis Andrew N. Davis

Andrew Davis is Chair of the firm’s Environmental Practice Group. He counsels clients in transactional, permitting, compliance and enforcement matters under federal and state health and safety, hazardous waste, air and water pollution, site development and property transfer laws.

Read more about Andrew N. DavisEmail
Photo of Sarah Kettenmann Sarah Kettenmann

Sarah is a member of Shipman’s Environmental Practice Group where she assists clients by creating technical and legal solutions to complex regulatory challenges. Sarah maintains a robust environmental regulatory and transactional practice, and guides buyers, sellers and lenders/investors in industrial and commercial real…

Sarah is a member of Shipman’s Environmental Practice Group where she assists clients by creating technical and legal solutions to complex regulatory challenges. Sarah maintains a robust environmental regulatory and transactional practice, and guides buyers, sellers and lenders/investors in industrial and commercial real property transactions to manage risks, including investigation, disclosure, remediation, liability and other legal or regulatory burdens that environmental contamination can trigger. Sarah helps clients comply with federal and state environmental, health, and safety (EHS) protocols, including regulatory compliance, auditing, and due diligence and is experienced in the development of environmental compliance programs. She has also helped corporate clients navigate enforcement actions brought under the Toxic Substances Control Act (TSCA), Occupational Safety and Health Act (OSHA), and Federal Insecticide, Fungicide, and Rodenticide Act (FIFRA).

Read more about Sarah KettenmannEmail
Show more Show less
  • Posted in:
    Employment & Labor
  • Blog:
    Employment Law Letter
  • Organization:
    Shipman & Goodwin LLP
  • Article: View Original Source

Call us at 1-800-913-0988 or email sales@lexblog.com.

Facebook LinkedIn Twitter RSS
The Library at LexBlog
  • About LexBlog
  • The Field We Built
  • Library at LexBlog
  • Our Beliefs
  • Our Team
  • Contact LexBlog
  • Disclaimer
  • Editorial Policy
  • Terms of Service
  • Get Started
  • Publishing Solutions
  • Compass
  • Submit a Request
  • Support Center
  • System Status
Copyright © 2026, LexBlog, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
Law blog design & platform by LexBlog LexBlog Logo