Skip to content

Menu

LexBlog, Inc. logo
NetworkSub-MenuBrowse by SubjectBrowse by PublisherJoin the NetworkGet StartedSubscribeSupport
Contact Us
Search
Close

A New Challenge to Section 280E Could Result in Lower Taxes for State-Legal Medical Cannabis Businesses

By Joshua Horn on October 30, 2025
Email this postTweet this postLike this postShare this post on LinkedIn

A new U.S. Tax Court case, New Mexico Top Organics, Inc. d/b/a Ultra Health v. Commissioner, could reshape how Section 280E of the U.S. tax code applies to state-legal medical cannabis businesses.

Ultra Health argues that Section 280E turns on the Controlled Substances Act’s scheduling criteria — not its listed schedules — and that marijuana no longer meets the criteria for a Schedule I or II controlled substance.

If successful, the case could materially reduce the effective federal tax burden for compliant medical providers.

Read more about the case here.

  • Posted in:
    Cannabis, Tax
  • Blog:
    In The Weeds
  • Organization:
    Fox Rothschild LLP
  • Article: View Original Source

Call us at 1-800-913-0988 or email sales@lexblog.com.

Facebook LinkedIn Twitter RSS
  • About LexBlog
  • The Field We Built
  • Our Beliefs
  • Our Team
  • Contact LexBlog
  • Disclaimer
  • Editorial Policy
  • Terms of Service
  • Get Started
  • Publishing Solutions
  • Compass
  • Submit a Request
  • Support Center
  • System Status
Copyright © 2026, LexBlog, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
Law blog design & platform by LexBlog LexBlog Logo