Skip to content

Menu

LexBlog, Inc. logo
NetworkSub-MenuBrowse by SubjectBrowse by PublisherJoin the NetworkGet StartedSubscribeSupportContact
Search
Close

2025–2026 Federal Labor & Employment Law Update: EEOC and DOJ Signal Heightened Scrutiny of DEI Programs

By Nicholas Ustaski, Gerardo Medina & Daisy Ramirez on December 29, 2025
Email this postTweet this postLike this postShare this post on LinkedIn

Link to Takeaways Takeaways

  • DEI programs that involve quotas, restrict participation, or employ diversity-based selection criteria face heightened legal risk.
  • Employers may need to revisit DEI training content to avoid claims of discrimination or hostile work environments.
  • Proactive compliance reviews in 2025 can help employers reduce litigation and enforcement exposure heading into 2026.

As 2025 comes to a close, all U.S. employers face several important legislative and regulatory updates that reshape the workplace landscape heading into 2026, related to changes in federal law. A summary of such important updates applicable to all employers is provided below:

Link to EEOC and DOJ Issue Guidance on DEI-Related Discrimination EEOC and DOJ Issue Guidance on DEI-Related Discrimination

On March 19, 2025, the U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (“EEOC”) and the U.S. Department of Justice (“DOJ”) jointly issued a press release and guidance cautioning employers that certain diversity, equity, and inclusion (“DEI”) initiatives may violate Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as amended. The announcement marked a significant shift in federal enforcement priorities under the current administration, emphasizing that employment actions motivated—even in part—by an individual’s race, sex, or other protected characteristic could constitute unlawful discrimination.

The agencies released two companion documents:

  1. “What To Do If You Experience Discrimination Related to DEI at Work” – a one-page technical assistance document (the “Guidance”); and
  2. “What You Should Know About DEI-Related Discrimination at Work” – a more detailed set of FAQs.

Both documents warn that employer DEI programs may be unlawful if they involve:

  • Implementing quotas or attempting to “balance” a workforce by race, sex, or other protected traits;
  • Limiting participation in training, mentoring, sponsorship, or networking opportunities based on protected characteristics;
  • Selecting or excluding candidates from interview slates or employment opportunities because of protected traits; or
  • Restricting membership in employee resource groups to certain demographic groups.

The FAQs further clarify that Title VII protects all workers, including those in majority groups, and that there is no legal distinction between “reverse” discrimination and other forms of discrimination. They also caution that DEI training could give rise to a hostile work environment claim if the content, design, or implementation is discriminatory in nature.

The EEOC’s new guidance signals a heightened focus on DEI-related discrimination enforcement, urging employers to review and, if necessary, revise existing DEI programs to ensure compliance with Title VII. As a result, all employers should consider:

  • Opening DEI-related programs, mentorships, and fellowships to all employees;
  • Avoiding diversity-based interview slate requirements;
  • Ensuring employee resource groups are inclusive and open to all interested participants; and
  • Reviewing DEI training materials to avoid “unconscious bias” content that could be construed as discriminatory.

The EEOC has indicated that it will continue to scrutinize DEI-related employment practices closely in 2025 and beyond.

If you have any questions about the information in this post, please contact the authors or your Dykema relationship attorney.

Photo of Nicholas Ustaski Nicholas Ustaski

Nick represents employers of all sizes in a variety of industries on complex employment matters, including experience on hundreds of matters related to complex national and international corporate transactions. His practice primarily consists of, labor and employment due diligence, policy review and revisions…

Nick represents employers of all sizes in a variety of industries on complex employment matters, including experience on hundreds of matters related to complex national and international corporate transactions. His practice primarily consists of, labor and employment due diligence, policy review and revisions, executive management consulting and advisement, mergers and acquisitions and other types of transactions, and employment litigation defense.

Read more about Nicholas UstaskiEmail
Show more Show less
Photo of Gerardo Medina Gerardo Medina

Gerardo Medina is an associate attorney in Dykema’s Chicago office, specializing in labor and employment law. He excels at crafting strategic, tailored solutions for clients, whether through negotiation, mediation, or litigation. His meticulous approach and thorough preparation equip his clients with the confidence…

Gerardo Medina is an associate attorney in Dykema’s Chicago office, specializing in labor and employment law. He excels at crafting strategic, tailored solutions for clients, whether through negotiation, mediation, or litigation. His meticulous approach and thorough preparation equip his clients with the confidence they need to make informed decisions.

Read more about Gerardo MedinaEmail
Show more Show less
Photo of Daisy Ramirez Daisy Ramirez

Daisy Ramirez is an associate attorney in Dykema’s Labor and Employment and Litigation groups, providing counsel to clients on a range of employment and commercial disputes. Daisy assists clients in navigating complex workplace issues and represents them in various litigation matters.

Read more about Daisy RamirezEmail
  • Posted in:
    Employment & Labor
  • Blog:
    Dykema Labor & Employment Law Blog
  • Organization:
    Dykema
  • Article: View Original Source

Call us at 1-800-913-0988 or email sales@lexblog.com.

Facebook LinkedIn Twitter RSS
The Library at LexBlog
  • About LexBlog
  • The Field We Built
  • Library at LexBlog
  • Our Beliefs
  • Our Team
  • Contact LexBlog
  • Disclaimer
  • Editorial Policy
  • Terms of Service
  • Get Started
  • Publishing Solutions
  • Compass
  • Submit a Request
  • Support Center
  • System Status
Copyright © 2026, LexBlog, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
Law blog design & platform by LexBlog LexBlog Logo