Skip to content

Menu

LexBlog, Inc. logo
NetworkSub-MenuBrowse by SubjectBrowse by PublisherJoin the NetworkGet StartedSubscribeSupport
Contact Us
Search
Close

What Does Cannabis Rescheduling Mean for Your Taxes and When Will Relief Arrive?   

By Sarah A. Westby & Deanna McWeeney on January 6, 2026
Email this postTweet this postLike this postShare this post on LinkedIn
cannabisdollars

On December 18, 2025, President Trump issued an executive order, “Increasing Medical Marijuana and Cannabidiol Research” directing the U.S. Attorney General to reclassify cannabis from a Schedule I controlled substance to a Schedule III controlled substance under the Controlled Substances Act. The Executive Order notes that cannabis’ current classification has impeded medical marijuana and CBD research and it is “critical to close the gap between current medical marijuana and CBD use and medical knowledge of risks and benefits.” 

As a Schedule I controlled substance, cannabis businesses were unable to deduct ordinary and necessary expenses paid in carrying on their trade or business for federal tax purposes under Section 280E of the Internal Revenue Code (“Section 280E”). Section 280E disallowed deductions for business expenses if such trade or business consisted of “trafficking in controlled substances” as defined in Schedule I and II of the Controlled Substances Act. This means that cannabis businesses cannot deduct typical operating expenses such as rent, utilities, employee wages, advertising, or legal fees. Cannabis businesses can still subtract the cost of goods sold (COGS) from their gross receipts to determine gross income. COGS includes direct costs related to the production or acquisition of the product itself, such as raw materials, packaging, and labor directly involved in cultivation or manufacturing. This allowance provides some relief for cultivators and manufacturers, but Section 280E imposes crushing tax burdens on retailers, with many paying an effective tax rate of 60-70% or more.  Section 280E coupled with state-regulated licensing and testing requirements make running a cannabis business exceptionally expensive, and virtually untenable for most small retailers. Because the Executive Order removes cannabis from the definition of businesses engaged in “trafficking” under Section 280E, cannabis businesses will be able to deduct their business expenses for federal tax purposes if and when rescheduling occurs.  

However, the Executive Order does not accomplish rescheduling in and of itself. Rather, it tasks the U.S. Attorney General with rescheduling cannabis “in the most expeditious manner in accordance with Federal law.” The rulemaking process requires that the rule must go through public comment period and then the final rule must be published in the Federal Register, which may take several months. It is likely that the Executive Order will be challenged in court as well. Until it is officially reclassified, cannabis is still classified as a Schedule I controlled substance and subject to Section 280E of the Internal Revenue Code. Therefore, cannabis businesses should not take any deductions for business expenses for federal tax purposes until the reclassification is final. The Executive Order provides no indication when the reclassification will take effect. Therefore, businesses should assume that the reclassification of cannabis will apply to tax years starting in the year which the final rule takes effect unless other guidance is provided. If rescheduling occurs in 2026, it is unclear whether cannabis operators will be permitted to claim ordinary business deductions for part or all of 2026.  Cannabis businesses should expect to file their 2025 tax returns under the current application of Section 280E, but should speak with their tax advisers about options including evaluating their financials and liabilities for future years and whether there are any corporate restructuring opportunities available given this reclassification.

The impact for state tax purposes will depend on the jurisdiction, as state tax conformity with federal law varies. Certain states, including Connecticut, New York and Massachusetts already decoupled from the federal prohibition of deducting such expenses. Other states automatically follow federal tax law, and some states may impose state specific Section 280E prohibitions after the federal law is finalized. Businesses must continue to comply with both federal and state law after the rescheduling is finalized.

In sum, rescheduling may bring widespread tax relief for cannabis businesses, but there are still several regulatory hurdles to clear before that day arrives. 

Photo of Sarah A. Westby Sarah A. Westby

Sarah is the Chair of Shipman’s Cannabis Industry Team and a Partner in our Employment and Labor Practice Group. She advises clients on formation and management of a cannabis business, interpretation of state and federal cannabis laws and regulations, social equity qualifications and…

Sarah is the Chair of Shipman’s Cannabis Industry Team and a Partner in our Employment and Labor Practice Group. She advises clients on formation and management of a cannabis business, interpretation of state and federal cannabis laws and regulations, social equity qualifications and partnerships, business-related disputes, employment matters and contracts. Sarah also counsels clients on a wide variety of employment matters, including discrimination, medical leave, sexual harassment, compensation, termination, severance, and workplace safety.  She has significant experience litigating cases in state and federal court and before administrative agencies.  Sarah also serves as the Vice Chair of the Board of Directors for Simply Smiles, Inc., a not-for-profit organization that builds villages of foster homes for Native children in the United States and Mexico.

Read more about Sarah A. WestbyEmail
Show more Show less
Photo of Deanna McWeeney Deanna McWeeney

Deanna McWeeney is an associate in the firm’s Tax and Employee Benefits practice group. She has experience in general legal matters, contracts, negotiations, tax planning, audit defense, mergers and acquisitions, and other related transactions.

Read more about Deanna McWeeneyEmail
  • Posted in:
    Tax
  • Blog:
    Connecticut State & Local Tax Alert
  • Organization:
    Shipman & Goodwin LLP
  • Article: View Original Source

Call us at 1-800-913-0988 or email sales@lexblog.com.

Facebook LinkedIn Twitter RSS
  • About LexBlog
  • The Field We Built
  • Our Beliefs
  • Our Team
  • Contact LexBlog
  • Disclaimer
  • Editorial Policy
  • Terms of Service
  • Get Started
  • Publishing Solutions
  • Compass
  • Submit a Request
  • Support Center
  • System Status
Copyright © 2026, LexBlog, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
Law blog design & platform by LexBlog LexBlog Logo