Skip to content

Menu

LexBlog, Inc. logo
NetworkSub-MenuBrowse by SubjectBrowse by PublisherJoin the NetworkGet StartedSubscribeSupport
Contact Us
Search
Close

Avoid Costly Mistakes: Breaking Down the New Guidance for Form I-9

By Sofia Alvarez, Jennifer M. Trulock & Keith Covington on May 5, 2026
Email this postTweet this postLike this postShare this post on LinkedIn
Avoid Costly Mistakes: Breaking Down the New Guidance for Form I-9

Table of Contents

  • Background
  • Changes from Prior Guidance
  • Recommendations

On March 16, 2026, U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) published a fact sheet that changes how many Form I-9 violations are classified.

Link to Background Background

The Immigration Reform and Control Act (IRCA) requires employers to verify the identity and employment eligibility of their employees hired in the United States after November 6, 1986. The regulations that support IRCA make the Form I-9, the Employment Eligibility Verification form, the method of such verification.

Link to Changes from Prior Guidance Changes from Prior Guidance

Prior to the publication of the fact sheet by U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS), ICE used a memorandum published on March 6, 1997, known as the “Virtue Memo,” to classify Form I-9 violations into two categories: substantive or technical. The ICE fact sheet departs from the memorandum by classifying many additional types of Form I-9 errors as substantive violations. For example, an employee’s failure to list his or her date of birth in Section 1 of the Form I-9 or the employer’s authorized representative’s failure to date the signature in Section 2, which formerly were considered technical violations, are now substantive violations. This is a major concern for employers because substantive violations can lead to additional fines and employer exposure. For a full list of what ICE now considers a substantive violation, see the new fact sheet. 

The Form I-9 administrative inspection process is initiated with the service of a Notice of Inspection by ICE, and employers have at least three business days to produce all Forms I-9 requested along with supporting documentation. The forms are then reviewed by ICE for compliance. Technical violations are minor and normally can be corrected during the I-9 inspection process, although they can become substantive violations if not fixed within 10 business days. Substantive violations are more serious, and there is no notification or correction period for such violations.

An employer may be issued a Notice of Intent to Fine (NIF) for substantive violations. In determining the fine amount, ICE generally considers the number of substantive violations divided by the number of Forms I-9 that should have been presented for inspection. This “violation percentage” is then used by ICE to determine the civil penalty base fine amount to be assessed. This base fine amount can then be enhanced, mitigated, or deemed neutral by five statutory factors: (1) size of the business; (2) good faith of the employer; (3) seriousness of the violations; (4) involvement of unauthorized workers; and (5) history of violations.

Link to Recommendations Recommendations

Here are some practical steps employers can take to make sure they are compliant with this new Form I-9 guidance:

  • Review the new fact sheet. Educate yourself on what has changed and understand the potential implications.
  • Review your Forms I-9. Conduct an internal audit of your existing Forms I-9. Identify and correct any errors.
  • Train your personnel. Make sure the personnel responsible for completing your Forms I-9 are knowledgeable about the process and are committed to doing it right.

At the end of the day, compliance is key!  

Photo of Sofia Alvarez Sofia Alvarez

Sofia Alvarez is an associate in the firm’s Litigation Practice Group.

Read more about Sofia AlvarezEmailSofia's Linkedin Profile
Photo of Jennifer M. Trulock Jennifer M. Trulock

Jennifer Trulock advises companies on managing workplace legal issues, conducting investigations into employee misconduct, and preventing employment lawsuits. She also is experienced in handling acquisition/divestiture employment issues, including due diligence, pre-merger planning and post-merger integration issues. Jennifer counsels employers on developing and applying…

Jennifer Trulock advises companies on managing workplace legal issues, conducting investigations into employee misconduct, and preventing employment lawsuits. She also is experienced in handling acquisition/divestiture employment issues, including due diligence, pre-merger planning and post-merger integration issues. Jennifer counsels employers on developing and applying personnel policies and in responding to and resolving complaints before reaching litigation. She also assists clients in negotiating employment agreements, as well as separation agreements.

Read more about Jennifer M. TrulockEmailJennifer's Linkedin Profile
Show more Show less
Photo of Keith Covington Keith Covington

Keith Covington practices labor and employment, immigration, and construction law in the firm’s Birmingham office. He counsels employers on a wide variety of topics, including labor relations, union avoidance, equal employment opportunity, OSHA compliance, disability accommodation, non-compete agreements, and issues relating to employee…

Keith Covington practices labor and employment, immigration, and construction law in the firm’s Birmingham office. He counsels employers on a wide variety of topics, including labor relations, union avoidance, equal employment opportunity, OSHA compliance, disability accommodation, non-compete agreements, and issues relating to employee discipline and termination. His immigration practice includes worksite compliance and obtaining employer-based non-immigrant and immigrant visas for foreign national employees.

Read more about Keith CovingtonEmailKeith's Linkedin Profile
Show more Show less
  • Posted in:
    Employment & Labor
  • Blog:
    Labor & Employment Insights
  • Organization:
    Bradley Arant Boult Cummings LLP
  • Article: View Original Source

Call us at 1-800-913-0988 or email sales@lexblog.com.

Facebook LinkedIn Twitter RSS
  • About LexBlog
  • The Field We Built
  • Our Beliefs
  • Our Team
  • Contact LexBlog
  • Disclaimer
  • Editorial Policy
  • Terms of Service
  • Get Started
  • Publishing Solutions
  • Compass
  • Submit a Request
  • Support Center
  • System Status
Copyright © 2026, LexBlog, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
Law blog design & platform by LexBlog LexBlog Logo