Skip to content

Menu

LexBlog, Inc. logo
NetworkSub-MenuBrowse by SubjectBrowse by PublisherJoin the NetworkGet StartedSubscribeSupport
Contact Us
Search
Close

Online Retailers Face Rising Risk from Strike-Through Pricing Claims

By Shahin O. Rothermel & Ellen T. Berge on May 8, 2026
Email this postTweet this postLike this postShare this post on LinkedIn

Table of Contents

  • Surge in DC CPPA Pricing Lawsuits
  • What the Data Reveals About Pricing Claims
  • Nationwide Reach of DC Consumer Protection Law
  • Practical Steps for Pricing Compliance

A recent review of civil filings in Washington, DC reveals a conspicuous pattern challenging strike-through pricing: a single nonprofit plaintiff, represented by a small group of attorneys, has filed more than 150 lawsuits against online retailers across the country—many of them small businesses.

Link to Surge in DC CPPA Pricing Lawsuits Surge in DC CPPA Pricing Lawsuits

A DC-based organization is filing the wave of lawsuits under the District of Columbia Consumer Protection Procedures Act (CPPA). The lawsuits challenge so-called reference pricing, strikethrough, or “sale” pricing. They allege misleading price comparisons, failure to disclose material facts, and ambiguous representations that tend to mislead. The letters typically seek statutory damages of $1,500 per product purchased, plus attorneys’ fees. The plaintiffs allege that selling into DC is enough to create nationwide exposure.

What is surprising is not the fact of the lawsuits, but their volume. Across 158 lawsuits, the complaints themselves seek roughly $2.5 million in aggregate, with an average demand of about $17,000 per case. While reported settlements are often lower, the volume and consistency of these demands suggest a repeat-play model that relies on standardized claims and economic pressure to drive resolution.

Link to What the Data Reveals About Pricing Claims What the Data Reveals About Pricing Claims

The defendants are overwhelmingly small and mid-sized online retailers, including specialty e-commerce stores (pens, fabrics, barber supplies, sporting goods) and companies selling low-cost consumer goods—often priced under $20.

The claims center on whether advertised discounts reflect a bona fide comparison price and whether the discounted product was ever sold at the lower sale price. The DC CPPA prohibits misrepresentations about “the reasons for, existence of, or amounts of price reductions.” 

The plaintiffs argue that they do not need to plead reliance or injury, taking the position that they only need to show that a practice tends to mislead. The statute provides for $1,500 per violation, an incredible amount when considering that the lawsuits challenge small-dollar items.

Link to Nationwide Reach of DC Consumer Protection Law Nationwide Reach of DC Consumer Protection Law

The recent cases illustrate how the CPPA can function as a nationwide enforcement tool. The plaintiffs allege that shipping products into DC provides a hook for claims, even when the company has no other presence in DC. Plaintiffs assert that the CPPA allows nonprofit organizations to bring claims on behalf of the public, making it possible for them to pursue high-volume litigation. Furthermore, because the products are low dollar, many companies have no choice but to settle to avoid the costs of litigating. Plaintiffs are then able to scale these lawsuits against many retailers using similar pricing formats.

Link to Practical Steps for Pricing Compliance Practical Steps for Pricing Compliance

For companies that rely on promotional pricing, this trend raises a few immediate considerations:

  • Reviewing how “sale” or “discount” pricing is presented. Companies should review their “was/now” pricing, strikethrough prices, and “on sale” claims to see the message reasonably conveyed to consumers
  • Ensure that reference prices are accurate and substantiated. Review documentation surrounding their pricing history
  • Consult counsel on compliance with state-specific consumer protection laws
  • Take demand letters seriously. But evaluate options before responding with a knee-jerk reaction
  • Consider Geographic Exposure.  Even limited sales into DC could create risk
  • Do Not Assume Low Price Points Reduce Risk. Many of the products at issue cost less than $20. The exposure comes from statutory damages and fees—not the value of the transaction

Of course, pricing statutes and lawsuits are not exclusive to DC. Many states, including California, have laws governing price reduction claims. 

To learn more about these lawsuits, join our webinar on Wednesday, May 27 at 12:00-1:00pm date (RSVP here.) If you have received a demand letter challenging your pricing practices, contact the authors.  Meta description: DC CPPA lawsuits are rising against ecommerce pricing practices. Learn legal risks, trends, and compliance steps for reference pricing claims.

Photo of Shahin O. Rothermel Shahin O. Rothermel

Shahin Rothermel is an experienced counselor and defender who helps advertisers, retailers, merchants, and marketers advance their business goals while reducing legal and regulatory risks. Shahin provides clients with up-to-date, practical insights into the constantly evolving advertising, marketing, and e-commerce regulations, which allows…

Shahin Rothermel is an experienced counselor and defender who helps advertisers, retailers, merchants, and marketers advance their business goals while reducing legal and regulatory risks. Shahin provides clients with up-to-date, practical insights into the constantly evolving advertising, marketing, and e-commerce regulations, which allows her clients to make informed decisions. She has achieved successful resolutions, dismissals, and full walkaways in court, saving clients millions of dollars. She takes a pragmatic approach as a counselor, considering the implications of her advice for her clients’ marketing campaigns and their bottom lines.

Read more about Shahin O. RothermelEmail
Show more Show less
Photo of Ellen T. Berge Ellen T. Berge

Ellen Berge provides counsel on regulatory compliance, government investigations, contract negotiations, and general business matters. Ellen focuses on advertising, marketing practices, payment processing, and merchant services. Her clients include major brand advertisers and direct-response retailers, and lead generators, telemarketers, media agencies, software providers…

Ellen Berge provides counsel on regulatory compliance, government investigations, contract negotiations, and general business matters. Ellen focuses on advertising, marketing practices, payment processing, and merchant services. Her clients include major brand advertisers and direct-response retailers, and lead generators, telemarketers, media agencies, software providers, and others who serve them. On the merchant services side, she leads a practice that works with banks, processors, sales agents, payment facilitators, independent software vendors, and fintech and financial services businesses. Ellen also serves as the firm’s managing partner of Professional Development and Recruiting.

Read more about Ellen T. BergeEmail
Show more Show less
  • Posted in:
    Business and Commercial
  • Blog:
    All About Advertising Law
  • Organization:
    Venable LLP
  • Article: View Original Source

Call us at 1-800-913-0988 or email sales@lexblog.com.

Facebook LinkedIn Twitter RSS
  • About LexBlog
  • The Field We Built
  • Our Beliefs
  • Our Team
  • Contact LexBlog
  • Disclaimer
  • Editorial Policy
  • Terms of Service
  • Get Started
  • Publishing Solutions
  • Compass
  • Submit a Request
  • Support Center
  • System Status
Copyright © 2026, LexBlog, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
Law blog design & platform by LexBlog LexBlog Logo