Skip to content

Menu

LexBlog, Inc. logo
NetworkSub-MenuBrowse by SubjectBrowse by PublisherJoin the NetworkGet StartedSubscribeSupport
Contact Us
Search
Close

DOT Stance Firm: Medical Marijuana Does Not Excuse Positive Drug Test Results

By Kathryn J. Russo on May 15, 2026
Email this postTweet this postLike this postShare this post on LinkedIn

The Department of Transportation’s Office of Drug and Alcohol Policy and Compliance published answers on May 15, 2026, regarding the rescheduling of certain medical marijuana products to Schedule III of the Controlled Substance Act (CSA) by the Department of Justice (DOJ).

By Order dated April 22, 2026, the DOJ immediately placed all FDA-approved marijuana products and marijuana products regulated by a state medical marijuana license in Schedule III of the CSA. DOT regulations require that covered employers test for marijuana and make testing positive for marijuana disqualifying. Since medical marijuana products were placed in Schedule III, questions have arisen as to how medical marijuana should be addressed for DOT-regulated employees.

As stated on the ODAPC website:

QUESTION:

Recently, the Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA) issued an order (Order) that reclassified FDA-approved drug products derived from marijuana and marijuana products regulated by a State medical marijuana license from Schedule I to Schedule III drugs under the Controlled Substances Act (CSA). When reviewing a laboratory reported marijuana positive drug test result, can a Medical Review Officer (MRO) deem the test a “negative” if the employee alleges the positive resulted from consuming a State licensed marijuana product?

ANSWER:

  • No. Currently, there is no instance when the MRO could verify a laboratory-confirmed marijuana positive drug test result as “negative” when an employee claims the positive was caused by a State licensed marijuana product.
  • Even after rescheduling, State-dispensed marijuana does not constitute an FDA-approved drug. Without FDA approval for a controlled substance, it cannot be prescribed.
  • A “legitimate medical explanation” requires use of a legally prescribed controlled substance in compliance with Federal laws governing such a prescription. 49 CFR §§ 40.137(a); 40.141(b).
  • Although the MRO may be presented with documentation such as State-issued medical marijuana cards, physician recommendations or certifications, or dispensary records or receipts, these documents do not satisfy part 40 requirements for a “legitimate medical explanation.”
  • Marijuana use under State marijuana programs or other non-prescription sources do not qualify as a “legitimate medical explanation” under 49 CFR § 40.137(a). In addition, marijuana use is not compatible with safety-sensitive functions.

DOT-regulated employers should continue to test for marijuana in accordance with DOT drug and alcohol testing regulations. State-issued medical marijuana cards and licenses do not excuse positive marijuana drug test results. Please contact a Jackson Lewis attorney with any questions.

Photo of Kathryn J. Russo Kathryn J. Russo

Kathryn J. Russo is a principal in the Long Island, New York, office of Jackson Lewis P.C. She is a firm resource on the legal issues implicated in workplace drug and alcohol testing arising under federal, state and local laws, as well as…

Kathryn J. Russo is a principal in the Long Island, New York, office of Jackson Lewis P.C. She is a firm resource on the legal issues implicated in workplace drug and alcohol testing arising under federal, state and local laws, as well as substance abuse management and marijuana laws’ impact on employers.

Kathryn helps clients navigate workplace problems involving drugs and alcohol. She regularly works with corporate counsel and human resources executives to develop substance abuse policies to comply with federal drug and alcohol testing regulations (including all agencies of the U.S. Department of Transportation), as well as state and local drug and alcohol testing laws and marijuana laws in all 50 states. In addition, she defends employers in litigation where drug and alcohol test results are at issue, and frequently conducts “reasonable suspicion” training for employers in connection with their substance abuse policies. Kathryn also advises employers on leave and disability management issues arising when employees seek leave or other accommodations related to substance abuse rehabilitation.

Read more about Kathryn J. RussoEmail
Show more Show less
  • Posted in:
    Other
  • Blog:
    Drug and Alcohol Testing Law Advisor
  • Organization:
    Jackson Lewis P.C.
  • Article: View Original Source

Call us at 1-800-913-0988 or email sales@lexblog.com.

Facebook LinkedIn Twitter RSS
  • About LexBlog
  • The Field We Built
  • Our Beliefs
  • Our Team
  • Contact LexBlog
  • Disclaimer
  • Editorial Policy
  • Terms of Service
  • Get Started
  • Publishing Solutions
  • Compass
  • Submit a Request
  • Support Center
  • System Status
Copyright © 2026, LexBlog, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
Law blog design & platform by LexBlog LexBlog Logo