Skip to content

Menu

LexBlog, Inc. logo
NetworkSub-MenuBrowse by SubjectBrowse by PublisherJoin the NetworkGet StartedSubscribeSupportContact
Search
Close

Connecticut Simplifies Cannabis Taxation: THC Potency Tax Replaced with Flat 10.75% Excise

By Deanna McWeeney & Sarah A. Westby on October 20, 2026
Email this postTweet this postLike this postShare this post on LinkedIn
cannabisdollars

Effective October 1, 2026, Connecticut has replaced its multi-tiered, potency-based cannabis excise tax with a single flat rate of 10.75% of gross receipts on all adult-use cannabis retail sales. Under the prior structure, retailers calculated tax on a per-milligram-of-THC basis across three product categories—flower, edibles, and all other products. The new law collapses all three into one percentage-of-sale calculation, regardless of product type.

The new 10.75% excise is imposed on top of the existing 3% municipal cannabis tax and the 6.35% state sales and use tax—bringing the combined burden on adult-use sales to roughly 20.10%. Medical cannabis sales, delivery-service sales, and licensee-to-licensee transfers remain exempt. The separate $1/container excise on infused beverages also remains in place.Businesses should evaluate whether the 10.75% rate results in a higher or lower effective tax burden compared to the prior potency-based rates for their particular product mix. High-THC products that previously generated significant per-milligram tax liability may see a relative decrease, while lower-potency products could see a relative increase.

The new tax structure applies to sales occurring on or after October 1, 2026. Retailers should update point-of-sale systems to calculate tax as a straight percentage of gross receipts rather than performing per-milligram THC calculations. Returns filed for sales periods beginning October 1 should reflect the new methodology.

The shift to a gross-receipts-based tax was a major industry priority last session for operational simplification and competitive advantage. Retailers no longer need to calculate tax on a per-milligram-of-THC basis across multiple product categories. This should reduce compliance costs and the risk of calculation errors. In addition, the change closely aligns Connecticut’s cannabis tax framework with that of Massachusetts. 

Photo of Deanna McWeeney Deanna McWeeney

Deanna McWeeney is an associate in the firm’s Tax and Employee Benefits practice group. She has experience in general legal matters, contracts, negotiations, tax planning, audit defense, mergers and acquisitions, and other related transactions.

Read more about Deanna McWeeneyEmail
Photo of Sarah A. Westby Sarah A. Westby

Sarah is the Chair of Shipman’s Cannabis Industry Team and a Partner in our Employment and Labor Practice Group. She advises clients on formation and management of a cannabis business, interpretation of state and federal cannabis laws and regulations, social equity qualifications and…

Sarah is the Chair of Shipman’s Cannabis Industry Team and a Partner in our Employment and Labor Practice Group. She advises clients on formation and management of a cannabis business, interpretation of state and federal cannabis laws and regulations, social equity qualifications and partnerships, business-related disputes, employment matters and contracts. Sarah also counsels clients on a wide variety of employment matters, including discrimination, medical leave, sexual harassment, compensation, termination, severance, and workplace safety.  She has significant experience litigating cases in state and federal court and before administrative agencies.  Sarah also serves as the Vice Chair of the Board of Directors for Simply Smiles, Inc., a not-for-profit organization that builds villages of foster homes for Native children in the United States and Mexico.

Read more about Sarah A. WestbyEmail
Show more Show less
  • Posted in:
    Cannabis, Tax
  • Blog:
    Connecticut State & Local Tax Alert
  • Organization:
    Shipman & Goodwin LLP
  • Article: View Original Source

Call us at 1-800-913-0988 or email sales@lexblog.com.

Facebook LinkedIn Twitter RSS
The Library at LexBlog
  • About LexBlog
  • The Field We Built
  • Library at LexBlog
  • Our Beliefs
  • Our Team
  • Contact LexBlog
  • Disclaimer
  • Editorial Policy
  • Terms of Service
  • Get Started
  • Publishing Solutions
  • Compass
  • Submit a Request
  • Support Center
  • System Status
Copyright © 2026, LexBlog, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
Law blog design & platform by LexBlog LexBlog Logo