Skip to content

Menu

LexBlog, Inc. logo
NetworkSub-MenuBrowse by SubjectBrowse by PublisherJoin the NetworkGet StartedSubscribeSupportContact
Search
Close

When is Water Damage from a Leaky Pipe a Covered Loss?

By Anosh Zaghi on September 25, 2012
Email this postTweet this postLike this postShare this post on LinkedIn

I was sitting on the chair at the barbershop the other day and listened to my barber give me an account about his recent experience with a pipe leak at his home. My barber told me that he awoke one morning to discover dampness on the floor only to learn that a pipe connected to his upstairs wet bar had burst causing water to flow to the downstairs level as well. Naturally, my first question was “Is your insurance covering the damage?” Fortunately, his response was yes.

This or something similar has happened to most of us at one point or another. It is good to keep in mind that damage caused by a leaky pipe is not always covered under a homeowners policy, and is commonly excluded. Typical exclusions are written as follows:

We do not insure for any loss to the property . . . which is caused by . . . continuous or repeated seepage or leakage of water or steam from a . . . plumbing system. . .
* * * *
This peril does not include loss or damage . . . caused by water or the presence of water over a period of time from any constant or repeating gradual, intermittent or slow discharge, seepage, leakage, trickle, collection or overflow of water from any source, even if from the usage of any plumbing …

Most policies only extend coverage for “sudden and accidental” discharge or overflow of water from a plumbing system. The exclusion based on seepage and leakage applies to the gradual breakdown or disintegration of a pipe as opposed to a sudden rupture.1 Therefore, to determine whether coverage exists, the key question to ask is whether the pipe break occurred suddenly (e.g., a sudden pipe burst or rupture) or the pipe gradually broke or gave way. Coverage should be provided if your situation is the former.


1 Finn v. Continental Ins. Co. (1990) 218 Cal. App. 3d 69.

  • Posted in:
    Insurance
  • Blog:
    Property Insurance Coverage Law Blog
  • Organization:
    Merlin Law Group, P.A.
  • Article: View Original Source

Call us at 1-800-913-0988 or email sales@lexblog.com.

Facebook LinkedIn Twitter RSS
The Library at LexBlog
  • About LexBlog
  • The Field We Built
  • Library at LexBlog
  • Our Beliefs
  • Our Team
  • Contact LexBlog
  • Disclaimer
  • Editorial Policy
  • Terms of Service
  • Get Started
  • Publishing Solutions
  • Compass
  • Submit a Request
  • Support Center
  • System Status
Copyright © 2026, LexBlog, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
Law blog design & platform by LexBlog LexBlog Logo