Jordan Vick

Blogs: Carpe Datum Law, Consumer Class Defense Blog

Latest Articles

Seyfarth Shaw Partner Jordan Vick to Present at the 15th Annual Advanced eDiscovery Institute in Washington, DC

By Jordan Vick on August 17, 2018

Seyfarth Shaw Partner Jordan Vick is on the panel for the “Playing by the Rules: Rule Changes Essential to Your Practice” session on Friday, November 16, at Georgetown Law’s 15th annual Advanced eDiscovery Institute in Washington, D.C. Session topics include: The 2015 Amendments to the FRCP and their actual impacts on practitioners, including unintended consequence How the changes to Federal Rule of Evidence 902 will change how parties and the court can streamline authentication of…

Consumer Class Defense Blog

Senate Kills CFPB Rule Prohibiting Class Action Waivers

By Jordan Vick on October 26, 2017

Today the Senate struck down a new Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (“CFPB”) rule which would have prohibited providers of financial products and services from including class action waivers in their arbitration agreements with consumers. The action is a win for the financial services industry. Background Way back in March 2015 we blogged about the CFPB’s study of pre-dispute arbitration contracts in connection with the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act (“Dodd-Frank”). The CFPB’s…

Consumer Class Defense Blog

Supreme Court to California Courts: You Can’t Ignore Us or the FAA

By Carrie Price & Jordan Vick on December 17, 2015

On Monday, the U.S. Supreme Court issued its highly-anticipated opinion in DirecTV, Inc. v. Imburgia et al., 577 U.S. ___ (2015), which reaffirmed its ruling in AT&T Mobility LLC v. Concepcion, 56 U.S. 333 (2011), dealing yet another blow to California Courts’ attempts to invalidate class action waivers. Background The plaintiffs in Imburgia filed their lawsuit in 2008, arguing that class action arbitration waivers were per se unenforceable in California under Discover Bank v.…

Consumer Class Defense Blog

New FCC Order Spurs Legal Challenges

By Olivia Henry & Jordan Vick on July 24, 2015

The Association of Credit and Collection Professionals (ACA) swiftly-filed a petition for review of the FCC’s July 10, 2015 Declaratory Ruling and Order (FCC 15-72) in the U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit. The petition challenges the FCC’s treatment of automatic dialing systems, predictive dialers and its definition of prior express consent. Similar petitions were also filed by Sirius XM Radio and the Professional Association for Customer Engagement (PACE), which filed in the…

Consumer Class Defense Blog

The Positives and Negatives of the FCC’s Recent Omnibus Order on the TCPA

By Jordan Vick, Esther Slater McDonald & Stephanie A. Stewart on July 15, 2015

On Friday, July 10, 2015, the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) issued an omnibus, Declaratory Ruling and Order (FCC Ruling) seeking to clarify certain ambiguities in the Telephone Consumer Protection Act (TCPA). The TCPA was enacted in 1991 with the purpose of protecting consumers’ privacy rights against unwanted robocalls. Background Briefly, an individual is liable under the TCPA if they use an autodialer or prerecorded message to make a non-emergency call to a wireless phone without…

Consumer Class Defense Blog

You Are Invited! Upcoming Webinar: Hot Topics and Trends in Consumer Class Action Law

By Jason Stiehl, Giovanna A. Ferrari & Jordan Vick on April 29, 2015

On Tuesday, May 26, 2015 at 12:00 p.m. Central, Jason P. Stiehl, Giovanna A. Ferrari and Jordan P. Vick will present the first installment of the 2015 Class Action Webinar series. They will provide a summary of key decisions from 2014, identify key trends for companies to watch for in 2015, as well as practical “best practices” and risk management for the future. In 2014, companies saw a major change in the focus and risk…

Consumer Class Defense Blog

Seventh Circuit Says No to Anti-Suit Injunction Pending Final Approval of Settlement

By Jordan Vick on March 27, 2015

By Eddy Salcedo The Seventh Circuit recently weighed in on the circuit split over whether a federal court, after preliminarily approving a class action settlement but before final approval, may enjoin class members from pursuing litigation related to the underlying class claims. In Adkins v. Nestle Purina PetCare,the court ruled that such injunctions were improper. — F.3d — (7th Cir. Mar. 2, 2015). Background Plaintiffs argued that their dogs became ill and were injured after…

Consumer Class Defense Blog

#OptIn #OptOut

By Jordan Vick & Robyn Marsh on March 20, 2015

Regardless of whether a class is opt-in or opt-out, providing class notice is a challenge. As technology evolves, so does the ability to reach class members who would otherwise be unreachable. But as attorneys increasingly seek to utilize non-traditional methods of class notification, such as Facebook, Twitter and LinkedIn, courts have struggled to draw appropriate limits. Two recent decisions illustrate this. Recent Developments In Mark, et al. v. Gawker Media LLC, et al, group of…

Consumer Class Defense Blog

Seventh Circuit Slams Class Action Settlement in Consumer Fraud Case as a “Selfish Deal” and Sets New Rules for Judging the Reasonableness of Class Settlements.

By Jordan Vick & Robyn Marsh on November 21, 2014

The Seventh Circuit Court of Appeals recently invalidated a nationwide settlement agreement covering six consumer fraud class actions (“Settlement Agreement”) brought against NBTY, Inc., Rexall Sundown, Inc., and Target Corporation (“Defendants”). See Pearson v. NBTY, Inc., No. 14-1198 (decided Nov. 19, 2014). Each case was premised on Defendants’ allegedly deceptive marketing and sale of glucosamine supplements, which are marketed as promoting joint health. Background Defendants are in the business of marketing, selling, and distributing a…

Consumer Class Defense Blog

Illinois Supreme Court to Once Again Review $10B Consumer Fraud Class Action Against Philip Morris

By Jordan Vick on October 22, 2014

The Illinois Supreme Court recently granted a Petition for Leave to Appeal in Price v. Phillip Morris, Inc., after the Illinois Appellate Court for the Fifth District effectively reinstated a $10 Billion verdict against Philip Morris from 2003. 9 N.E.3d 599 (5th Dist. 2014). The Illinois Supreme Court’s decision to once again weigh in on the case sets the stage for a substantive analysis of class actions and damages awards under the Illinois Consumer Fraud…

Jordan Vick

Seyfarth Shaw Partner Jordan Vick to Present at the 15th Annual Advanced eDiscovery Institute in Washington, DC

Senate Kills CFPB Rule Prohibiting Class Action Waivers

Supreme Court to California Courts: You Can’t Ignore Us or the FAA

New FCC Order Spurs Legal Challenges

The Positives and Negatives of the FCC’s Recent Omnibus Order on the TCPA

You Are Invited! Upcoming Webinar: Hot Topics and Trends in Consumer Class Action Law

Seventh Circuit Says No to Anti-Suit Injunction Pending Final Approval of Settlement

#OptIn #OptOut

Seventh Circuit Slams Class Action Settlement in Consumer Fraud Case as a “Selfish Deal” and Sets New Rules for Judging the Reasonableness of Class Settlements.

Illinois Supreme Court to Once Again Review $10B Consumer Fraud Class Action Against Philip Morris

Company

Support

New to the Network