Skip to content

Menu

LexBlog, Inc. logo
NetworkSub-MenuBrowse by SubjectBrowse by PublisherJoin the NetworkGet StartedSubscribeSupport
Contact Us
Search
Close

An Unsolved Problem? Claims of Post-Employment Retaliation by the (Formerly) Problem Employee

By Matthew A. Steinberg, Samantha Abeysekera & Christopher R. Lepore on August 4, 2015
Email this postTweet this postLike this postShare this post on LinkedIn

Most employers know that various employment laws prohibit retaliation against employees who engage in protected activity, such as those who complain of discrimination, report purportedly unlawful conduct, or support fellow employees’ charges of similar conduct. What fewer employers may realize is that legal prohibitions on retaliation may, in some circumstances, extend beyond employees’ actual employment. Some of the post-employment conduct courts have considered to be retaliatory includes: providing poor recommendations (or refusing to furnish the same), blacklisting, making threats to future employers, opposing applications for unemployment benefits, filing false criminal charges, and filing unfounded counterclaims. As such, before taking action against former employees, employers should consider whether a court might consider such conduct to be in direct retaliation for a former employee’s opposition to an unlawful employment practice.

Other post-employment retaliation lawsuits have arisen out of more peculiar fact patterns. For example, in Oram v. SoulCycle LLC, et al., 979 F. Supp. 2d 498 (S.D.N.Y. 2013), a former indoor cycling (or “spin”) instructor at SoulCycle brought wage-and-hour claims. Upon bringing the lawsuit, SoulCycle banned the plaintiff and his attorney from attending spin classes. The plaintiff then amended his complaint to include claims of retaliation, contending that: (a) the plaintiff, as a former employee, was protected by anti-retaliation provisions; and (b) SoulCycle’s ban on attendance qualified as an adverse action, because it “might have dissuaded a reasonable worker from making or supporting similar charges.” Despite dismissing the plaintiff’s wage-and-hour claims, the court declined to dismiss the plaintiff’s retaliation claim, finding that anti-retaliation provisions extend to former employees and a “reasonable worker” in plaintiff’s position could find the ban on attendance to be retaliatory.

Nevertheless, despite the holdings mentioned above, employers can often be justified in taking well-founded action against former employees. Join us at the 20th Annual Akerman Labor & Employment Law Seminar where we will discuss these and other employment law issues.

Photo of Matthew A. Steinberg Matthew A. Steinberg

Matt Steinberg focuses his practice on employment law, both by advising clients on day-to-day workplace matters and defending clients on all aspects of employment-related litigation. Matt represents clients in various sectors, including technology, media, financial services, real estate, aviation, retail, and hospitality.

Read more about Matthew A. SteinbergEmail
Photo of Samantha Abeysekera Samantha Abeysekera

Samantha Abeysekera advises and litigates on behalf of management in a diverse array of industries, including financial services, market research, real estate, aviation, and technology start-ups. Both her litigation and advice-and-counseling work focuses on employment discrimination, harassment, restrictive covenants, and employment/separation agreements, as…

Samantha Abeysekera advises and litigates on behalf of management in a diverse array of industries, including financial services, market research, real estate, aviation, and technology start-ups. Both her litigation and advice-and-counseling work focuses on employment discrimination, harassment, restrictive covenants, and employment/separation agreements, as well as wage and hour matters involving exempt/non-exempt status, the calculation of hours worked, overtime pay, and other issues under the Fair Labor Standards Act and state wage and hour laws.

Read more about Samantha AbeysekeraEmail
Show more Show less
  • Posted in:
    Employment & Labor
  • Blog:
    HR Defense
  • Organization:
    Akerman LLP
  • Article: View Original Source

Call us at 1-800-913-0988 or email sales@lexblog.com.

Facebook LinkedIn Twitter RSS
  • About LexBlog
  • The Field We Built
  • Our Beliefs
  • Our Team
  • Contact LexBlog
  • Disclaimer
  • Editorial Policy
  • Terms of Service
  • Get Started
  • Publishing Solutions
  • Compass
  • Submit a Request
  • Support Center
  • System Status
Copyright © 2026, LexBlog, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
Law blog design & platform by LexBlog LexBlog Logo