Skip to content

Menu

LexBlog, Inc. logo
NetworkSub-MenuBrowse by SubjectBrowse by PublisherJoin the NetworkGet StartedSubscribeSupportContact
Search
Close

Employers May Not Require Back-To-Work Antibody Tests of Employees

By Michael N. Chesney on June 18, 2020
Email this postTweet this postLike this postShare this post on LinkedIn

On June 17, 2020, the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) updated its Technical Assistance Questions and Answers to clarify that employers may not require COVID-19 antibody testing before permitting employees to re-enter the workplace. Antibody tests can show whether the subject had a past infection or has recovered from the virus that causes COVID-19. Currently, there is a fair amount of debate in the scientific community as to what the results of antibody tests mean and whether they demonstrate immunity to the virus.

The EEOC’s position results from separate guidelines from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), which provides that antibody test results “should not be used to make decisions about returning persons to the workplace.” Given the CDC’s position regarding antibody testing, the EEOC explained that “an antibody test at this time does not meet the ADA’s ‘job related and consistent with business necessity,’ standard for medical examinations or inquiries for current employees.” According to the EEOC, requiring an employee to submit to an antibody test before re-entering the workplace violates the ADA’s prohibition of certain medical inquiries/tests of current employees.

It is important to note that antibody tests are not the same as COVID-19 tests, which look for signs of active virus in the subject. The EEOC has previously indicated in its guidance that under the ADA employers may require employees to submit to a COVID-19 test before re-entering the workplace because an individual with the virus will pose a direct threat to others.

The EEOC’s Technical Assistance Questions and Answers, including the updated guidance related to antibody testing can be found here.

Photo of Michael N. Chesney Michael N. Chesney

Mike represents management in all aspects of labor and employment law, including representing employers in court, arbitrations, administrative proceedings, and other disputes. He advises companies, both large and small, on human resources issues and litigation prevention, including advice on terminations, compliance with employment…

Mike represents management in all aspects of labor and employment law, including representing employers in court, arbitrations, administrative proceedings, and other disputes. He advises companies, both large and small, on human resources issues and litigation prevention, including advice on terminations, compliance with employment laws, workplace investigations and the preparation of policies and employment agreements. Mike prides himself on providing strategic and practical advice to minimize the risk of employment litigation. Should litigation arise, Mike is a prepared, practical and aggressive advocate for his clients. He has successfully represented employers in single plaintiff and class/collective actions in state and federal courts, arbitration matters, and before administrative agencies throughout the country.

Read more about Michael N. ChesneyEmailMichael's Linkedin Profile
Show more Show less
  • Posted in:
    Employment & Labor
  • Blog:
    Labor & Employment Law Navigator
  • Organization:
    Frantz Ward LLP
  • Article: View Original Source

Call us at 1-800-913-0988 or email sales@lexblog.com.

Facebook LinkedIn Twitter RSS
The Library at LexBlog
  • About LexBlog
  • The Field We Built
  • Library at LexBlog
  • Our Beliefs
  • Our Team
  • Contact LexBlog
  • Disclaimer
  • Editorial Policy
  • Terms of Service
  • Get Started
  • Publishing Solutions
  • Compass
  • Submit a Request
  • Support Center
  • System Status
Copyright © 2026, LexBlog, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
Law blog design & platform by LexBlog LexBlog Logo