Skip to content

Menu

LexBlog, Inc. logo
NetworkSub-MenuBrowse by SubjectBrowse by PublisherJoin the NetworkGet StartedSubscribeSupportContact
Search
Close

Employers Face New Issues with Quicker Rollout of COVID-19 Vaccine

By Jill O'Toole, Daniel Schwartz & Sarah N. Niemiroski on February 25, 2021
Email this postTweet this postLike this postShare this post on LinkedIn
GettyImages-1253358164

With Governor Lamont’s change to the vaccine distribution program to an age-based rollout starting March 1, 2021, all employers (not simply those “essential” workplaces) must now consider whether to require, or even to encourage, their employees to get the vaccine.

At our webinar earlier this month (which is still available for on-demand viewing here), we discussed some of the areas that employers should start to think about. Employers should rush those considerations to completion with the state’s new rollout plan.

Risks and Litigation Concerns

Unvaccinated Employees

Unvaccinated employees pose a risk to people that they encounter during the workday. This issue is particularly applicable to the service industry. For example, an unvaccinated waitress may interact with dozens, if not hundreds of people during her shift. Can the employer be liable if the waitress infected a customer?

Putting the causation concerns aside for a moment, an employer in the above situation may be hit with a multitude of claims, including but not limited to: civil assault; respondeat superior; negligent supervision; and intentional or negligent infliction of emotional distress. These claims, in the context of COVID-19 infection, have not yet been tested in the courts; however, we anticipate a continued rise in such claims.

Throughout the past year, businesses have faced litigation threats based on actions taken, or not taken, during the pandemic. Consider the case of a recent wedding in Maine: a 55-person wedding reception in rural Maine was linked to 177 COVID-19 infections, including seven deaths. The wedding venue is now rumored to face a lawsuit based on negligence. The prospective suit demonstrates how claims may be levied against businesses in the age of COVID-19.

Employers will have to consider the threats that unvaccinated employees may pose in the workplace and how those threats can be mitigated. Ultimately, employers may have to consider mandating vaccines for the segment of their population that refuses to get the vaccine voluntarily.

Mandatory Vaccination Program

While vaccinating employees may help reduce liability for COVID-19 cases, requiring an employee to get the vaccine creates its own list of legal considerations.

Complications arise when an employee declines to get vaccinated due either to a disability or religious reasons. Refusing to get the vaccine for disability or religious reasons triggers the application of anti-discrimination laws. On a national level, employers would need to look to the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) and to Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964. Under the ADA, workers may ask their employers for an accommodation (which may or may not be able to be provided). Further, under Title VII, workers may request an accommodation if taking the vaccine violates their “sincerely held” religious beliefs.

We will be discussing accommodations further at an upcoming mini-webinar in early March.

Protections for Employers

There are two statutory sources of protection for employers from possible COVID-19 claims: workers’ compensation coverage and the Public Readiness and Emergency Preparedness Act (PREP).

Workers’ Compensation

Workers’ compensation coverage is dependent on state law and whether vaccination is mandated by the employer. In most states, if the employer mandates vaccination, employees’ liability claims would be compensable under workers’ compensation. Some states, such as California, would consider a vaccine-related injury compensable under workers’ compensation even if the employer did not require vaccination.

PREP: Public Readiness and Emergency Preparedness Act

The PREP Act is a 2005 federal law that empowers the Health & Human Services (HHS) Secretary to provide legal protection to companies making or distributing medical supplies, such as vaccines and treatments unless there is “willful misconduct” by the company. The PREP Act was invoked by HHS Secretary Alex Azar in February 2020 in response to the COVID-19 crisis. It protects “covered persons” from being sued for money damages over injuries related to the administration or use of products to treat or protect against COVID-19 until 2024. The PREP Act provides very broad coverage. Employers who administer a vaccination program for employees may be protected by the PREP Act.

Deciding whether to implement a mandatory or voluntary vaccine program is a fact-specific endeavor. At the end of the day, employers must create a plan that addresses the needs and interests of the company and the health and safety of workers.  Be sure to discuss such plans with your legal counsel to ensure compliance with applicable federal and state law.

Photo of Jill O'Toole Jill O'Toole

Jill O’Toole is the Co-Chair of the firm’s Business Litigation Practice Group. She has significant experience representing clients in complex commercial litigation, including state and federal class actions and multi-district litigation. She regularly represents manufacturing clients in litigation involving supply chain issues, customer…

Jill O’Toole is the Co-Chair of the firm’s Business Litigation Practice Group. She has significant experience representing clients in complex commercial litigation, including state and federal class actions and multi-district litigation. She regularly represents manufacturing clients in litigation involving supply chain issues, customer disputes and distributors. Her cases cover a broad range of business disputes involving antitrust, trade regulation, securities, fiduciary duties, insurance, contracts, business torts, and intellectual property.

Read more about Jill O'TooleEmail
Show more Show less
Photo of Daniel Schwartz Daniel Schwartz

Dan represents employers in various employment law matters such as employment discrimination, restrictive covenants, human resources, retaliation and whistle blowing, and wage and hour issues. He has extensive trial and litigation experience in both federal and state courts in a variety of areas…

Dan represents employers in various employment law matters such as employment discrimination, restrictive covenants, human resources, retaliation and whistle blowing, and wage and hour issues. He has extensive trial and litigation experience in both federal and state courts in a variety of areas, including commercial litigation and trade secret enforcement. Dan is the author of the independent Connecticut Employment Law Blog. The blog discusses new and noteworthy events in labor and employment law on a daily basis.

Read more about Daniel SchwartzEmailDaniel's Linkedin ProfileDaniel's Twitter Profile
Show more Show less
Photo of Sarah N. Niemiroski Sarah N. Niemiroski

Sarah is a member of the firm’s Employment and Labor practice group.  She assists public and private sector clients in a variety of matters, including grievance and interest arbitrations, prohibited practice proceedings, and labor negotiations. Sarah also represents employers before state and federal…

Sarah is a member of the firm’s Employment and Labor practice group.  She assists public and private sector clients in a variety of matters, including grievance and interest arbitrations, prohibited practice proceedings, and labor negotiations. Sarah also represents employers before state and federal courts and agencies with respect to employment matters ranging from employment discrimination and wrongful termination to tortious interference, breach of contract, and wage and hour claims.

Read more about Sarah N. NiemiroskiEmail
Show more Show less
  • Posted in:
    Employment & Labor
  • Blog:
    Employment Law Letter
  • Organization:
    Shipman & Goodwin LLP
  • Article: View Original Source

Call us at 1-800-913-0988 or email sales@lexblog.com.

Facebook LinkedIn Twitter RSS
The Library at LexBlog
  • About LexBlog
  • The Field We Built
  • Library at LexBlog
  • Our Beliefs
  • Our Team
  • Contact LexBlog
  • Disclaimer
  • Editorial Policy
  • Terms of Service
  • Get Started
  • Publishing Solutions
  • Compass
  • Submit a Request
  • Support Center
  • System Status
Copyright © 2026, LexBlog, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
Law blog design & platform by LexBlog LexBlog Logo