The United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas issued an order blocking the Federal Trade Commission’s (FTC) non-compete ban from taking effect on Aug. 20, 2024. In Ryan LLC v. Federal Trade Commission, 2:24-cv-986, Plaintiffs successfully argued that the FTC exceeded its statutory authority in propounding a nationwide ban on non-compete agreements. Originally set to take effect on Sept. 4, 2024, the ban—which would have voided millions of employment agreements—has now been paused as a result of the decision.

Judge Ada E. Brown ruled that the FTC did not have the authority to issue a rule with such broad and sweeping implications. “The Commission’s lack of evidence as to why they chose to impose such a sweeping prohibition . . . instead of targeting specific, harmful non-competes, renders the rule arbitrary and capricious,” Brown wrote. Importantly, her decision applies across the country.

Impact of the proposed non-compete ban

The ban would have rendered all existing and new non-compete agreements invalid, with only a handful of exceptions. The rule also would have prohibited employers from entering into new non-compete agreements with employees, with only one exception for “senior executives” earning more than $151,164 per year annually who are in a “policymaking position.” The rule would have also required employers to provide notice to workers that their current non-compete agreements were no longer valid.

The fight is likely not over, however, as a spokesperson for the FTC said the agency was disappointed with the ruling and is “seriously considering a potential appeal.”

What employers should do now

So, what does this mean for employers who have non-competes in place or who are looking to enter into non-competes with employees in the future? The court’s decision provides some much-needed certainty. For now, employers can continue to enforce these agreements and can enter into new ones that are otherwise compliant with applicable laws. Now would also be a good time to ensure existing non-competes are compliant with the state laws in which employers have operations, as the FTC stated the decision “does not prevent the FTC from addressing non-competes through case-by-case enforcement actions.”

If you have any questions on the ruling, please contact Kelsey Gee or Jennifer Huelskamp in the Porter Wright Labor & Employment Department.

Photo of Kelsey Gee Kelsey Gee

Kelsey is an associate in the firm’s Labor & Employment Department.

Photo of Jennifer Huelskamp Jennifer Huelskamp

Jen is a partner in the Labor & Employment Department with a practice focused on employment litigation and counseling. She has significant experience representing clients in state and federal courts and in proceedings before government agencies, including the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, the…

Jen is a partner in the Labor & Employment Department with a practice focused on employment litigation and counseling. She has significant experience representing clients in state and federal courts and in proceedings before government agencies, including the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, the Illinois Department of Labor and the Illinois Department of Human Rights. Jen also routinely practices in the general commercial litigation space.