Skip to content

Menu

LexBlog, Inc. logo
NetworkSub-MenuBrowse by SubjectBrowse by PublisherJoin the NetworkGet StartedSubscribeSupportContact
Search
Close

How Recent DOL Opinion Letters Impact Wage and Hour Practices

By Daniel Schwartz on January 6, 2026
Email this postTweet this postLike this postShare this post on LinkedIn
usdolbuilding
USDOL Headquarters in DC

Table of Contents

  • FLSA2026‑1 — Employers Choose Which Employees Are Exempt
  • FLSA2026‑2 — How Bonuses Affect the "Regular Rate of Pay"
  • FLSA2026‑3 — Roll Call and Counting Hours Worked
  • FLSA2026‑4 — Overtime Exemption for Commissioned Employees: Which Minimum Wage Applies and Whether Tips Count as Compensation
  • Final Thoughts

The U.S. Department of Labor’s Wage & Hour Division (WHD) has issued four new opinion letters under the Fair Labor Standards Act. These letters give employers clear guidance on how WHD will handle common compliance questions during investigations and audits. While opinion letters do not create new laws, they often indicate how the agency will enforce existing rules and can help reduce risk if you adjust your policies and practices to match their guidance. Employers should carefully review and quickly implement the recommendations in these letters.

Here’s a brief summary of the letters but first a caveat: Opinion letters are based on specific facts. Employers can use them for guidance, but should consult with employment law counsel to discuss how they apply to their own workplace.

Link to FLSA2026‑1 — Employers Choose Which Employees Are Exempt FLSA2026‑1 — Employers Choose Which Employees Are Exempt

This letter discusses whether an employee working as a licensed clinical social worker qualifies for the learned professional exemption under section 13(a)(1) of the FLSA. It also considers whether an employer can choose to classify such an employee as non-exempt, even if the exemption criteria are met. In this case, the employer paid the employee hourly, which does not meet the salary basis requirement for the exemption, even if the primary duties test is satisfied.

The key point in the letter is that even if an employee meets all the criteria for an FLSA exemption, it is up to the employer to claim the exemption. The law does not require employers to classify qualified employees as exempt. Instead, employers can choose to classify these employees as non-exempt, as long as they pay at least the federal minimum wage for all hours worked and overtime for any hours over 40 in a workweek. Employers may decide not to classify any qualified employees as exempt, or they may exempt only certain groups, such as managers, employees at specific grades or pay levels, or those working in particular office locations.

Link to FLSA2026‑2 — How Bonuses Affect the “Regular Rate of Pay” FLSA2026‑2 — How Bonuses Affect the “Regular Rate of Pay”

FLSA2026‑2 examines whether section 7(e) of the FLSA allows an employer to leave out certain bonus payments when calculating an employee’s regular rate of pay. The USDOL determined that these bonus payments must be included in the regular rate because the “safety, job duties, and performance bonuses” in question were incentive payments, not discretionary bonuses. The employer lost the discretion to decide whether to pay the bonuses because, once employees met specific criteria, they became entitled to receive the bonus.

Link to FLSA2026‑3 — Roll Call and Counting Hours Worked FLSA2026‑3 — Roll Call and Counting Hours Worked

In FLSA2026‑3, the WHD considers whether a union and employer can make a collective bargaining agreement that requires a 15-minute “roll call” before each shift, but does not count that time when calculating overtime under the FLSA. The DOL decided that this “roll call” time must be counted as “hours worked” and must be included when determining if employees work more than 40 hours in a week. However, the DOL also says that the collective bargaining agreement could include a provision that may partially exempt employees from overtime requirements.

Link to FLSA2026‑4 — Overtime Exemption for Commissioned Employees: Which Minimum Wage Applies and Whether Tips Count as Compensation FLSA2026‑4 — Overtime Exemption for Commissioned Employees: Which Minimum Wage Applies and Whether Tips Count as Compensation

FLSA2026‑4 explains whether, for the overtime exemption for certain commissioned employees under section 7(i) of the FLSA, an employer in a state where the state minimum wage is higher than the federal minimum wage should use the federal or the higher state minimum wage to meet the minimum pay requirement in section 7(i)(1). It also addresses whether tips count as compensation when determining if more than half of an employee’s earnings come from commissions, as required by section 7(i)(2).

The DOL states that if an employee at a qualifying retail or service business is paid more than one and a half times the federal minimum wage, they meet the minimum pay requirement in section 7(i)(1). While tips are not considered commissions under section 7(i), in certain situations, some of an employee’s tips can count as compensation when deciding if the employee is mainly paid by commission under section 7(i)(2).

Link to Final Thoughts Final Thoughts

As I mentioned earlier, opinion letters do not change laws or regulations, but they often clarify unclear areas and indicate how the Wage and Hour Division (WHD) will interpret difficult situations. Use these letters to improve your compliance, address documentation gaps, and train your frontline managers. Taking these steps now lowers your risk of lawsuits and helps you if the WHD investigates or if someone challenges your practices in court.

Photo of Daniel Schwartz Daniel Schwartz

Dan represents employers in various employment law matters such as employment discrimination, restrictive covenants, human resources, retaliation and whistle blowing, and wage and hour issues. He has extensive trial and litigation experience in both federal and state courts in a variety of areas…

Dan represents employers in various employment law matters such as employment discrimination, restrictive covenants, human resources, retaliation and whistle blowing, and wage and hour issues. He has extensive trial and litigation experience in both federal and state courts in a variety of areas, including commercial litigation and trade secret enforcement. Dan is the author of the independent Connecticut Employment Law Blog. The blog discusses new and noteworthy events in labor and employment law on a daily basis.

Read more about Daniel SchwartzEmailDaniel's Linkedin ProfileDaniel's Twitter Profile
Show more Show less
  • Posted in:
    Employment & Labor
  • Blog:
    Connecticut Employment Law Blog
  • Organization:
    Shipman & Goodwin LLP
  • Article: View Original Source

Call us at 1-800-913-0988 or email sales@lexblog.com.

Facebook LinkedIn Twitter RSS
The Library at LexBlog
  • About LexBlog
  • The Field We Built
  • Library at LexBlog
  • Our Beliefs
  • Our Team
  • Contact LexBlog
  • Disclaimer
  • Editorial Policy
  • Terms of Service
  • Get Started
  • Publishing Solutions
  • Compass
  • Submit a Request
  • Support Center
  • System Status
Copyright © 2026, LexBlog, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
Law blog design & platform by LexBlog LexBlog Logo