Skip to content

Menu

LexBlog, Inc. logo
NetworkSub-MenuBrowse by SubjectBrowse by PublisherJoin the NetworkGet StartedSubscribeSupport
Contact Us
Search
Close

Oklahoma Amends Medical Marijuana Law: Employers Lose Discretion to Designate ‘Safety-Sensitive’ Positions

By Kathryn J. Russo on April 23, 2026
Email this postTweet this postLike this postShare this post on LinkedIn

Oklahoma’s medical marijuana law has been amended to permit employers to have “zero tolerance” drug and alcohol standards regarding medical marijuana users in “safety-sensitive” positions. However, the law also revised the definition of “safety-sensitive positions” to remove employers’ discretion to classify positions as safety-sensitive and limits that definition to specific positions only. House Bill No. 3127. The amendment will take effect on Nov. 1, 2026.

The law still provides that employers may not refuse to hire, discipline, discharge, or otherwise penalize an applicant or employee solely on the basis of the applicant’s or employee’s status as a medical marijuana licensee.

However, with respect to positive drug test results, the amended law provides that an employer may not refuse to hire, discipline, discharge, or otherwise penalize an applicant or employee solely on the basis of a positive drug test result for marijuana, unless:

  1. The applicant or employee is not in possession of a valid medical marijuana license;
  2. The licensee possesses, consumes, or is under the influence of medical marijuana or medical marijuana product while at the place of employment or during the fulfillment of employment obligations; or
  3. Such action is taken pursuant to a written drug and alcohol testing policy adopted and enforced in accordance with the Standards for Workplace Drug and Alcohol Testing Act, Section 551 et seq. of Title 40 of Oklahoma Statutes.

The amended language further clarifies that applicants and employees in safety-sensitive positions (as defined) will be subject to a zero-tolerance drug and alcohol standard.  This standard applies regardless of any employer policy that may treat employees in other positions differently.

Significantly, the definition of “safety-sensitive” has been revised to remove an employer’s discretion to consider positions to be safety sensitive based on the employer’s reasonable belief that the job could affect the safety and health of the employee or others. The revised definition reads:

“Safety-sensitive” means any position in which the employee performs one more more of the following duties, including, but not limited to:

  1. The handling, packaging, processing, storage, disposal or transport of hazardous materials;
  2. The operation of a motor vehicle, other vehicle, equipment, machinery or power tools;
  3. Repairing, maintaining or monitoring the performance or operation of any equipment, machinery or manufacturing process, the malfunction or disruption of which could result in injury or property damage;
  4. Performing firefighting duties;
  5. The operation, maintenance or oversight of critical services and infrastructure including, but not limited to, electric, gas, and water utilities, power generation or distribution;
  6. The extraction, compression, processing, manufacturing, handling, packaging, storage, disposal, treatment or transport of potentially volatile, flammable, combustible materials, elements, chemicals or any other highly regulated component;
  7. Dispensing pharmaceuticals;
  8. Carrying a firearm; or,
  9. Direct patient care or direct child care.

Employers in Oklahoma should consult with counsel regarding the implications of the amended medical marijuana law and update their drug testing policies as needed. Please contact a Jackson Lewis attorney if you have any questions.

Photo of Kathryn J. Russo Kathryn J. Russo

Kathryn J. Russo is a principal in the Long Island, New York, office of Jackson Lewis P.C. She is a firm resource on the legal issues implicated in workplace drug and alcohol testing arising under federal, state and local laws, as well as…

Kathryn J. Russo is a principal in the Long Island, New York, office of Jackson Lewis P.C. She is a firm resource on the legal issues implicated in workplace drug and alcohol testing arising under federal, state and local laws, as well as substance abuse management and marijuana laws’ impact on employers.

Kathryn helps clients navigate workplace problems involving drugs and alcohol. She regularly works with corporate counsel and human resources executives to develop substance abuse policies to comply with federal drug and alcohol testing regulations (including all agencies of the U.S. Department of Transportation), as well as state and local drug and alcohol testing laws and marijuana laws in all 50 states. In addition, she defends employers in litigation where drug and alcohol test results are at issue, and frequently conducts “reasonable suspicion” training for employers in connection with their substance abuse policies. Kathryn also advises employers on leave and disability management issues arising when employees seek leave or other accommodations related to substance abuse rehabilitation.

Read more about Kathryn J. RussoEmail
Show more Show less
  • Posted in:
    Cannabis
  • Blog:
    Drug and Alcohol Testing Law Advisor
  • Organization:
    Jackson Lewis P.C.
  • Article: View Original Source

Call us at 1-800-913-0988 or email sales@lexblog.com.

Facebook LinkedIn Twitter RSS
  • About LexBlog
  • The Field We Built
  • Our Beliefs
  • Our Team
  • Contact LexBlog
  • Disclaimer
  • Editorial Policy
  • Terms of Service
  • Get Started
  • Publishing Solutions
  • Compass
  • Submit a Request
  • Support Center
  • System Status
Copyright © 2026, LexBlog, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
Law blog design & platform by LexBlog LexBlog Logo