An employee on short-term disability is ready to come back. HR tells them they need a release from the doctor who took them off work. Fair enough. Then HR adds a twist: tell us when the appointment is so we
The Ohio Employer Law Blog, published by Jon Hyman, focuses on practical employment law issues affecting business owners and employers. It covers topics such as discrimination claims under Title VII, the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) interactive process, workplace accommodations, labor and employment litigation, and employer compliance with federal and state employment regulations. The blog also discusses current developments in civil rights enforcement, workplace diversity and inclusion challenges, wage and hour laws, and employer liability. It provides analysis of court decisions, regulatory guidance, and real-world employer scenarios to help businesses navigate complex employment law matters.
You can prove trade secrets theft cold and still lose the injunction.
That’s the lesson from the 6th Circuit’s recent decision in UEC Holdings v. Hatcher.
Steven Hatcher was VP of the utility division at United Electric, a Kentucky…
Bartending doesn’t launder a manager’s cut of the tip pool. That’s the entire lesson of a recent Department of Labor Opinion Letter.
Here’s the setup. A restaurant has servers “tip out” a percentage of sales to bartenders, hosts, and…
The Department of Labor just answered a question a lot of employers have been wondering about: if an employee splits her day between home and office, who pays for the drive in between?
TL;DR: Splitting the workday between home and…
Two days.
That’s the entire gap between John Shoemaker asking McKesson Corp. for FMLA leave and McKesson telling him he was fired. A federal judge just said that two-day gap alone survives summary judgment.Shoemaker was a Senior Director overseeing McKesson’s…
“What may be awesome punishment for an impecunious individual defendant may be wholly insufficient to influence the behavior of a prosperous corporation.”That’s the 3rd Circuit, not me. And it’s the whole ballgame in Holmes v. American HomePatient.Here’s what earned…
“The inherent danger in well-timed increases in benefits is the suggestion of a fist inside the velvet glove.”That’s the 5th Circuit, describing what Starbucks did to its Buffalo stores once a union showed up. The court’s recent opinion in Starbucks …