Skip to content

Menu

LexBlog, Inc. logo
NetworkSub-MenuBrowse by SubjectBrowse by PublisherJoin the NetworkGet StartedSubscribeSupport
Contact Us
Search
Close

NLRB Sues California to Enjoin Enforcement of New Law

By Jarad M. Lucan & Sarah N. Niemiroski on November 7, 2025
Email this postTweet this postLike this postShare this post on LinkedIn
GettyImages2233637728

A new California law is the latest litigation target of the National Labor Relations Board (“NLRB”).  Signed into law in September, Assembly Bill 288 amended California labor law to allow the state’s labor board to certify unions and resolve labor disputes in the private sector when the NLRB “expressly or impliedly ceded jurisdiction.”  

When, exactly, does the NLRB cede jurisdiction (expressly or impliedly) under the new law? Under a number of conditions, including when the NLRB cannot render a decision due to a lack of quorum, when a case sits for over six months, or the NLRB fails to certify a union within six months.  The NLRB will also cede its jurisdiction if the Supreme Court finds that its members are “unconstitutionally protected from removal.”   In its preamble, the Assembly Bill 288 makes clear that the aim of the bill is to create a state remedy for the NLRB’s “inefficacy” at “protecting and enforcing workers’ rights.”  

California’s law joins Section 715 of the New York State Labor Relations Act, which now requires the NLRB to seek a court order any time it wants to assert jurisdiction. 

Expectedly, the NLRB has filed a lawsuit to enjoin the enforcement of Assembly Bill 288, just as it did Section 715 of the NY State Labor Relations Act.  

The National Labor Relations Act (“NLRA”) governs private sector labor relations in the United States. If there is a labor dispute between a private sector employer and an employee, then the NLRB typically has jurisdiction.   The NLRB asserts that Assembly Bill 288 is preempted by the NLRA under the Supremacy Clause of the United States Constitution because the law allegedly seeks “to regulate areas explicitly reserved for federal oversight, creating a parallel regulatory framework that conflicts with the NLRA.” 

Massachusetts has a similar bill that would empower state boards to adjudicate private sector labor relations. You may be asking – what about Connecticut? While Connecticut has a private sector labor relations act (the State Labor Relations Act), it does not seek to supplant the NLRB and only applies to private sector employees if the NLRB “has declined to assert jurisdiction.”  

Changes to Connecticut’s State Labor Relations Act are not anticipated. But we will be monitoring the NLRB’s challenge to both the New York and California laws. 

Photo of Jarad M. Lucan Jarad M. Lucan

Jarad is co-chair of Shipman’s Labor, Employment and Education Department, where he practices on behalf of both public and private sector clients.  Jarad has successfully represented employers in grievance arbitration matters, prohibited practice proceedings before the State Board of Labor Relations, and unfair…

Jarad is co-chair of Shipman’s Labor, Employment and Education Department, where he practices on behalf of both public and private sector clients.  Jarad has successfully represented employers in grievance arbitration matters, prohibited practice proceedings before the State Board of Labor Relations, and unfair labor practice proceedings before the National Labor Relations Board.  He has also represented employers in cases involving claims of discrimination and retaliation before the Commission on Human Rights and Opportunities, the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission and State and Federal Courts.

Read more about Jarad M. LucanEmail
Show more Show less
Photo of Sarah N. Niemiroski Sarah N. Niemiroski

Sarah is a member of the firm’s Employment and Labor practice group.  She assists public and private sector clients in a variety of matters, including grievance and interest arbitrations, prohibited practice proceedings, and labor negotiations. Sarah also represents employers before state and federal…

Sarah is a member of the firm’s Employment and Labor practice group.  She assists public and private sector clients in a variety of matters, including grievance and interest arbitrations, prohibited practice proceedings, and labor negotiations. Sarah also represents employers before state and federal courts and agencies with respect to employment matters ranging from employment discrimination and wrongful termination to tortious interference, breach of contract, and wage and hour claims.

Read more about Sarah N. NiemiroskiEmail
Show more Show less
  • Posted in:
    Employment & Labor
  • Blog:
    Employment Law Letter
  • Organization:
    Shipman & Goodwin LLP
  • Article: View Original Source

Call us at 1-800-913-0988 or email sales@lexblog.com.

Facebook LinkedIn Twitter RSS
  • About LexBlog
  • The Field We Built
  • Our Beliefs
  • Our Team
  • Contact LexBlog
  • Disclaimer
  • Editorial Policy
  • Terms of Service
  • Get Started
  • Publishing Solutions
  • Compass
  • Submit a Request
  • Support Center
  • System Status
Copyright © 2026, LexBlog, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
Law blog design & platform by LexBlog LexBlog Logo