Skip to content

On Feb. 25, 2026, San Francisco Mayor Daniel Lurie and District 5 Supervisor Bilal Mahmood introduced the Balanced Update to Incentivize Local Development (BUILD) Act, a legislative package designed to reduce transfer tax rates on large real estate transactions to revitalize stalled housing projects and stimulate economic development. By proposing a significant rollback of transfer tax increases that were implemented in 2020, the BUILD Act aims to make San Francisco more competitive with other major cities while maintaining revenue neutrality through targeted reforms.

Link to Summary of Proposed BUILD Act Changes Summary of Proposed BUILD Act Changes

Link to Transfer Tax Rate Reductions Transfer Tax Rate Reductions

The BUILD Act would reduce San Francisco’s transfer tax rates to pre-2020 levels for large transactions:

  • Properties valued at $10 million to $25 million: Rate would decrease from 5.5% to 2.75% (a 50% reduction)
  • Properties valued at $25 million and above: Rate would decrease from 6% to 3% (a 50% reduction)

The legislation would not affect transfer tax rates for single-family residences or property transfers below $10 million, which would remain at current levels.

Link to Current San Francisco Transfer Tax Structure Current San Francisco Transfer Tax Structure

Under the existing ordinance (Article 12-C of the Business and Tax Regulations Code), San Francisco imposes a tiered transfer tax system:

  • $100 to $250,000: $2.50 per $500 (0.5%)
  • $250,000 to $1 million: $3.40 per $500 (0.68%)
  • $1 million to $5 million: $3.75 per $500 (0.75%)
  • $5 million to $10 million: $11.25 per $500 (2.25%)
  • $10 million to $25 million: $27.50 per $500 (5.5%)
  • $25 million and above: $30 per $500 (6%)

Link to Elimination of Deed in Lieu of Foreclosure Exemption Elimination of Deed in Lieu of Foreclosure Exemption

To maintain revenue neutrality, the BUILD Act includes a companion ballot measure for November 2026 that would eliminate the transfer tax exemption for certain foreclosure transactions. Currently, Section 1108.2 of the San Francisco ordinance exempts deeds taken “as a result of or in lieu of foreclosure,” provided the consideration does not exceed the unpaid debt. Assessor-Recorder Joaquín Torres noted a “dramatic increase in the number of high-value commercial transfers claiming the exemption.” Because ending this exemption would increase tax on deed‑in‑lieu transactions, it cannot be enacted by ordinance alone; it must be approved by voters, unlike the transfer tax decreases. The mayor’s package targets the November 2026 ballot for this change. 

If the ballot measure passes, lenders and borrowers who use deed-in-lieu agreements as an alternative to foreclosure would face the transfer tax on the full value of the transferred property. Depending on the property’s value, this could result in a transfer tax obligation ranging from 2.25% (for properties valued between $5 million and $10 million) up to 3% under the BUILD Act proposed rate reductions. While the BUILD Act would lower documentary transfer tax (DTT) for arm’s-length sales of large commercial properties, the elimination of the deed-in-lieu exemption could simultaneously increase the effective DTT burden on asset transfers where lenders previously paid nothing.

Link to Economic Impact and Rationale Economic Impact and Rationale

Link to Housing Development Incentives Housing Development Incentives

The legislation aims to address San Francisco’s housing crisis by making development projects more financially viable. The city estimates that reducing transfer tax rates could save housing developers $32,850 per unit, representing up to 5% of total development costs. With approximately 50,000 entitled but unbuilt housing units in the city’s pipeline, the reforms target projects that are approved but economically infeasible under current tax rates.

Link to Labor and Business Support Labor and Business Support

The legislation has garnered support from major labor organizations, including the San Francisco Building and Construction Trades Council, North Coast States Carpenters Union, and Laborers Union Local 261, as well as the San Francisco Chamber of Commerce. Supporters argue that unlocking stalled projects would create thousands of union construction jobs.

Link to Legislative Process and Authority Legislative Process and Authority

Lowering transfer taxes under the BUILD Act can be implemented through legislation rather than a ballot measure due to Proposition C, passed in March 2024, which amended the city charter to allow transfer tax decreases (but not increases) through ordinance. This provides the Board of Supervisors with authority to reduce rates without voter approval, while maintaining the requirement for voter approval to raise rates.

The transfer tax portion of the BUILD Act was introduced to the Board of Supervisors on Feb. 24, 2026. In order to pass, there is a 30-day hold for the bill, a budget hearing, and two votes by the Board of Supervisors to enact the legislation. If the reductions are enacted, the ordinance would become operative on July 1, 2026.

Unlike legislation to enact a tax rate decrease, the elimination of the deed in lieu of foreclosure exemption, an effective rate increase, will still be subject to voter approval on the November 2026 ballot. Should the deed in lieu of foreclosure exemption survive the ballot box, the legislative transfer tax decreases would be unaffected.

Link to Takeaway Takeaway

The BUILD Act represents a significant policy shift aimed at stimulating San Francisco’s real estate market and housing production through strategic tax reduction. By rolling back 2020 transfer tax increases while closing exemption loopholes, the legislation seeks to incentivize residential and commercial development for property valued over $10,000,000. Property owners, developers, and investors may wish to monitor the legislation’s progress and consider the potential impact on transaction costs as well as the consequences of ending the deed in lieu of foreclosure exemption.

Photo of Colin Fraser Colin Fraser

Colin Fraser is a commercial litigator with experience in all phases of litigation in federal and state courts, and in arbitration and mediation, with a principal focus on complex matters. He is experienced in managing cases at the trial court level, including all…

Colin Fraser is a commercial litigator with experience in all phases of litigation in federal and state courts, and in arbitration and mediation, with a principal focus on complex matters. He is experienced in managing cases at the trial court level, including all aspects of discovery, motion practice, and trial. He also has experience prosecuting appeals before the Ninth Circuit and the California Court of Appeal. Colin also represents clients before legislative and regulatory bodies at the local and state levels.

Colin has handled cases with claims exceeding several billion dollars in potential liability and has experience in a broad range of areas affecting business clients, including contract law, intellectual property litigation, anti-trust, Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act (RICO), the Telephone Consumer Protection Act (TCPA), false advertising, unfair competition, real estate disputes, and shareholder disputes.

Photo of Bradley R. Marsh Bradley R. Marsh

Bradley R. Marsh is Co-Managing Shareholder of the San Francisco office and focuses his practice on tax controversy matters, including property, sales, payroll, business license, employment, franchise, parcel, district, documentary transfer, transient occupancy, utility user, income, parking, gift and estate taxes. He serves…

Bradley R. Marsh is Co-Managing Shareholder of the San Francisco office and focuses his practice on tax controversy matters, including property, sales, payroll, business license, employment, franchise, parcel, district, documentary transfer, transient occupancy, utility user, income, parking, gift and estate taxes. He serves as a co-chair of the State and Local Tax (SALT) Practice. Brad represents clients in audits, litigation and administrative hearings, as well as analyzing transactions and business models, and developing strategies for legislative resolutions.

Photo of Cris K. O'Neall Cris K. O'Neall

Cris K. O’Neall focuses his practice on ad valorem property tax and assessment counseling and litigation (appeal hearings and trials). For over 25 years, he has represented a variety of California taxpayers in equalization proceedings before county assessment appeals boards, the State Board…

Cris K. O’Neall focuses his practice on ad valorem property tax and assessment counseling and litigation (appeal hearings and trials). For over 25 years, he has represented a variety of California taxpayers in equalization proceedings before county assessment appeals boards, the State Board of Equalization, the Superior Court, the California Court of Appeal, and the California Supreme Court.

The clients Cris has served include owners of the following property types:

  • Healthcare (hospitals, skilled nursing and assisted living facilities, medical office buildings)
  • Hospitality (hotels and resorts)
  • Entertainment and recreation (entertainment venues, theme parks, golf courses, ski areas)
  • Retail (shopping centers, department stores)
  • Energy and natural resources (oil refineries, power plants, oil and gas fields, pipelines, quarries, service stations)
  • Public properties (airport concessions, port terminals, marinas, U.S. Forest Service land)
  • Food processing plants and distribution facilities/warehouses
  • Machinery & equipment, personal property (jet aircraft, harbor cranes)
Photo of Ruben Sislyan Ruben Sislyan

Ruben Sislyan focuses his practice on California state and local tax controversies at the audit, administrative, and judicial levels. He has broad experience representing Fortune 500 and middle-market companies, closely held businesses, start-ups, families, and individuals in a wide range of state and

Ruben Sislyan focuses his practice on California state and local tax controversies at the audit, administrative, and judicial levels. He has broad experience representing Fortune 500 and middle-market companies, closely held businesses, start-ups, families, and individuals in a wide range of state and local taxes, including corporate franchise/income, personal income, sales and use, property, tobacco, and gross receipts and other local taxes.

Ruben helps clients navigate through all stages of California’s complex administrative tax controversy process. He regularly practices before California’s state and local tax agencies and tribunals, including the Franchise Tax Board, the California Department of Tax and Fee Administration, the State Board of Equalization, the Office of Tax Appeals, and the Los Angeles Office of Finance. Ruben also has experience representing clients in California courts and challenging unlawful taxes.

Photo of Samuel Weinstein Astorga Samuel Weinstein Astorga

Samuel Weinstein Astorga is an Associate in Greenberg Traurig’s San Francisco office and is a member of the firm’s U.S. State and Local Tax (SALT) practice. Sam focuses his practice on SALT and Federal tax compliance matters including property taxes, documentary transfer taxes…

Samuel Weinstein Astorga is an Associate in Greenberg Traurig’s San Francisco office and is a member of the firm’s U.S. State and Local Tax (SALT) practice. Sam focuses his practice on SALT and Federal tax compliance matters including property taxes, documentary transfer taxes, penalty abatements, business revivals, and voluntary disclosure agreements. Sam represents clients before California taxing authorities, including the Franchise Tax Board and the California Department of Tax and Fee Administration. Sam is experienced in liaising with taxing authorities to effectively address client matters in administrative, transactional, and litigation matters.

Sam regularly advises on local tax issues such as the transient occupancy taxes, property tax refunds, and sales and use tax sharing agreements. Sam is also involved as a member of the California Lawyers Association Taxation Section Bay Area Chapter and is an active mentor and contributor at the San Francisco Office’s summer associate program.

Photo of Bree Burdick Bree Burdick

Bree Burdick focuses her practice on ad valorem property tax and assessment counseling and litigation (appeal hearings and trials). Bree also serves ultra-high-net-worth individual clients, partnerships, trusts, businesses, and LLCs on income tax planning and compliance matters. She advises clients on choice of…

Bree Burdick focuses her practice on ad valorem property tax and assessment counseling and litigation (appeal hearings and trials). Bree also serves ultra-high-net-worth individual clients, partnerships, trusts, businesses, and LLCs on income tax planning and compliance matters. She advises clients on choice of entity, business structures, real estate investments, and asset protection strategies for clients’ generational wealth planning needs. She also has experience defending clients in government audits.

Photo of Jennifer A. Vincent Jennifer A. Vincent

Jennifer A. Vincent focuses on federal and state tax controversies and litigation. Ms. Vincent represents both individuals and companies in proceedings before the Internal Revenue Service and before California taxing authorities, including the Franchise Tax Board and the California Department of Tax and…

Jennifer A. Vincent focuses on federal and state tax controversies and litigation. Ms. Vincent represents both individuals and companies in proceedings before the Internal Revenue Service and before California taxing authorities, including the Franchise Tax Board and the California Department of Tax and Fee Administration. She also assists clients with compliance counseling for both federal and state-based tax issues.

Ms. Vincent has considerable experience in defending clients in federal offshore audits and income tax examinations and in California income, sales and use tax, and property tax matters.