On September 16, 2026, a federal court granted an injunction that blocks the implementation of New Mexico’s regulations that would have required manufacturers to put a label on products containing intentionally added PFAS that are sold or distributed in the
Do we have an expectation of privacy in public? When data collected in public is retained and used to train AI, perhaps we do.
That is one of the questions raised in a letter from Senators Ron Wyden and Edward
The Revolutionary FAR Overhaul (RFO) may give contracting officers more discretion after a late quotation or offer is received before award. It does not, however, change the fundamental rule that a contractor still must get its submission to the government
When a company’s CEO allegedly feeds confidential financial data to his father’s investment firm, and that firm then swoops in with a buyout offer, you’d expect the law to have something to say about it.
For better or worse, many domestic violence Temporary Restraining Orders (TROs) settle without the entry of a Final Restraining Order (FRO), but with the parties entering into a Consent Order or agreement for “Civil Restraints.” These Orders/agreements resemble FROs in
Introduction: The First Hours
In the operations centers of major airlines, in the war rooms of airframe manufacturers, in the offices of insurers who have spent years pricing the risk of exactly this moment, the machinery of legal response begins
The New York City Department of Consumer and Worker Protection has proposed rules that would require merchants using consumer-facing automated customer service systems to clearly and conspicuously notify consumers that they are interacting with an automated system, not a human.
PFAS-related litigation continues to climb and to diversify as to claims and parties. See the attached graphics, updated through the third quarter of 2026. We will continue to update these graphics on a quarterly basis.
The Attorneys General (“AGs”) of fifteen states and the territory of Guam filed suit on October 1, 2026, in Indiana Commercial Court against EIDP, Inc., formerly known as E. I. du Pont de Nemours and Co. (“Old DuPont”), Corteva, Inc.
Your cookie solution may be working, but your work here is not done.
With all the website tracking demand letters and litigation, it is not enough just to deploy an out-of-the-box cookie solution.
The recent wave of website and app
